|
Radon found in school
We were going to run a different nugget today, but this
came to our attention in a round about way. So thanks to Gerry Duffy reporting
for The Scottish Sun. Here it is in its entirity...
A school was closed after experts found high levels of a
killer nuclear gas in classrooms. All four pupils were moved from Cabrach
Primary in Moray after the discovery of colourless radon.
Last night one source said
of the find: "It's scary to think that so much of this gas was in a school
- the parents must be terrified."
The school will be closed
until the Easter holidays next month while an underground pump is built to
safely release the gas into the atmosphere. Staff and kids will stay at another
primary until then
Radon,
which is used in nuclear power, occurs naturally in all rocks and soils.
Exposure can lead to lung cancer in severe cases. A Moray Council spokesman
said: "We are working closely with the Health Protection Agency and Health
and Safety Executive to carry out remediation work."(10/3/10)
Images: Miss Leeman's Web Bolg / Flickr
Watch out for those gulls - they may be radioactive!
The
North-West Evening Mail brings us this unusual environmental tale. Seagull
eggs are being destroyed at Sellafield to control the bird population amid radiation
fears. A specialist company is pricking the eggs in a bid to keep the
numbers down.
A Sellafield spokesman said the
strategy is working so other methods, such as culling with poisoned bait, are
not being looked at for the immediate future. The last time birds were poisoned
on site was in 2008 when 39 birds were killed.
It was reported in national
newspapers this week that an intensive culling programme was being considered
at the site as bosses were struggling to tackle the ever-increasing numbers of
seagulls. But that was strongly denied by the Sellafield spokesman. He said
there has been a 30 to 40 per cent year-on-year reduction in the number of
gulls on the site and that proves egg-pricking is working. He added that if the
company needs to look at further culling methods in the future, it will do.
“There are concerns that they have
been swimming in open ponds containing plutonium and radioactive waste, some of
which dates back to Britain’s atomic weapons programme of the 1950s and 1960s.”
Gulls flying around the site can become contaminated with radioactivity – such
as when they fly into open fuel storage ponds.
But the spokesman stressed any
contamination is so low it would not threaten public health. He said: “We are
aware of the potential for gulls to become contaminated with low levels of
radioactivity as a result of the operations at Sellafield.” (3/3/10)
Images:
Picture/Newsletter.com / NDA
US 'engaged in economic racism towards Native Americans'
‘Earth
Talk’, reporting for Health News Digest, brings us this.
Native
tribes across the American West have been, and continue to be, subjected to
significant amounts of
radioactive and otherwise hazardous waste as a result of living near
nuclear test sites, uranium mines, power plants and toxic waste dumps.
In some cases tribes are actually hosting hazardous waste on
their sovereign reservations - which are not subject to the same environmental
and health standards as U.S. land - in order to generate revenues. Native
American advocates argue that siting such waste on or near reservations is an
“environmental justice” problem, given that twice as many Native families live
below the poverty line than other sectors of U.S. society and often have few if
any options for generating income.
“In the quest to dispose of nuclear waste, the government
and private companies have disregarded and broken treaties, blurred the definition
of Native American sovereignty, and directly engaged in a form of economic
racism akin to bribery,” says Bayley Lopez of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation.
He cites example after example of the government and private companies taking
advantage of the “overwhelming poverty on native reservations by offering them
millions of dollars to host nuclear waste storage sites.” (22/2/10)
New cooling towers needed at Oyster Crerek - Exelon not happy
Kirk
Moore writing for the pages of the Ashbury Park Press goes
fishing.
Screening
and diverting devices that save fish from the Oyster
Creek nuclear plant's cooling water intake are "about as good as
it can get" in modern techniques, and the reactor's major impact on
Barnegat Bay is with the tiny organisms that get sucked in and destroyed, a top
state environmental official told a state Senate committee Monday.
Local
fishermen and environmental groups have insisted for years the power plant is
reducing numbers of clams and fish in the bay.
"Technically,
the issue is more entrainment than impingement," said Nancy Wittenberg, an
assistant commissioner in the state Department of Environmental Protection,
referring to the intake of fish eggs and larvae. A system of fish ladders and
chutes — what "I like to call an amusement ride for fish" — screen
out and bypass the larger animals, releasing them back into the plant's canal
that flows to Oyster Creek, Wittenberg said.
But
the only way to reduce the entrainment losses of tiny life stages is to reduce
the daily needs for water by constructing cooling towers, she told the state
Senate Environment and Energy Committee.The DEP has proposed a new permit for
the plant discharge that would require cooling towers; Oyster Creek operator
Exelon Corp. has warned it will close the plant if it is forced to build the
towers, saying that expense would make the reactor uneconomical. (10/2/10)
Local authorities say no to nuclear dumps in Spain
Emma
Pinedo, writing for those nice people at Reuters, sets her
sights on Spain. At least seven small Spanish towns had submitted bids to build
a nuclear
waste dump, but opposition from
regional authorities cast doubt over the long-delayed project.
About
a dozen towns in all have bid for the dump, most with populations of 500 or
less, all hoping the 700 million euro (£615 million) plan will bring
much-needed jobs in a country with some of the longest dole queues in Europe.
Spanish voters generally shun nuclear power and regional authorities, wary of
the project, have substantial autonomy from the central government and some
have announced their opposition.
"I
am willing to take every political, social and legal measure, whatever it
takes, to stop the nuclear dump being built in Castilla-La Mancha," said
Jose Maria Barreda, who is government head in the central-southern region. He
has ordered his legal team to study the legality of lodging an appeal against
two small councils in his region who tendered bids this week.
Barreda's
counterpart in northeastern Catalonia, Jose Montilla, opposes a bid by the town
of Asco (pictured) home to two of Spain's eight nuclear power
stations."Catalan power stations produce 40 percent of all of Spain's
power. We've done our bit," he said. (5/2/10)
Minnesota mad at non-collection of waste
Don
Davis, reporting for the Pierce County Herald web pages
has a slight clean up problem.
Minnesota
cities hosting nuclear power plants and some legislators are tired of federal
officials' refusal to pick up the waste as they promised decades ago.
"If
you had a garbage man who didn't show up for 28 years, would you continue to
pay the bill?" Rep. Joe Atkins, DFL-Inver Grove Heights, asked, as he told
members of his Minnesota House Commerce and Labor Committee about his proposal
to divert money now going to the federal government for nuclear waste
storage and use it in Minnesota instead.
Atkins'
plan would take the nearly $14 million Xcel Energy now sends the federal
government annually for nuclear storage and divide it two ways. Half would be
saved for cleanup when nuclear waste no longer is stored in Minnesota; the
other half would fund a new commission to manage nuclear waste and help local
communities pay for power plants' public safety needs.
Minnesota's
nuclear power plants are near Red Wing and Monticello, with radioactive waste
being stored near the reactors. Red Wing and the adjoining Prairie Island
Indian Community are the most affected by nuclear waste, with 625 tons stored
next to two reactors now. 2,450 tons of
radioactive waste may be stored there by 2045.
City
Council member Lisa Bayley said that Red Wing is not prepared to become a
long-term nuclear waste storage site. "We need a plan to deal with the
storage and protection of that waste.”(1/2/10)
Maralinga test site returned to former owners
Our
thanks to The Economist for this environmental report. Maralinga looks
much like the rest of Australia’s outback: Up close, there are differences. Its
long, quiet airstrip recalls a time when this was an unlikely epicentre of the
cold war. The desert is still littered with radioactive
plutonium and other fragments of atomic weapons that Britain exploded
more than 50 years ago.
Once
teeming with nuclear scientists and British and Australian servicemen,
Maralinga fell into eerie silence when the tests ended, in the early 1960s.
Then just before Christmas 2009, it returned to life. Dignitaries flew in as
guests of the Maralinga Tjarutja aborigines, a group that had been pushed aside
when their homeland was chosen as a test site. Keith Peters, one of its
leaders, presided over a ceremony to mark the end of his people’s long battle
to reclaim their traditional lands.
After
Australia agreed to its request for a test site, Britain exploded its first
atomic device off north-west Australia in 1952. Maralinga (an aboriginal word
meaning “place of thunder”), near the transcontinental railway in the state of
South Australia, was chosen later as a better site. Altogether, Britain
conducted 12 atmospheric atomic tests in Australia, including seven at
Maralinga, up to 1957. The worst contamination came from the so-called “minor
trials” of weapons components that took place for another six years. Tests at a
site called Taranaki left plutonium, uranium and beryllium dispersed across the
range. (20/1/10)
Images: Newspix (The Economist) / Jane’s Oceana
Some like it hot in Utah - but not the HEAL group..
Judy Fahys, reporting for The
Salt Lake Tribune, brings us this. A Utah environmental group has scheduled
a meeting with Gov. Gary Herbert to press its case that more testing is needed
to make sure depleted
uranium coming to Utah is not too hot.
HEAL
says it reviewed shipping papers for some Savannah River, S.C., cleanup waste
already in Utah and discovered that the DU, as depleted uranium is often
called, contains reactor waste in concentrations that might top the
radiological hazard limit set in state law. But, according to the group, it's
hard to say for sure because the U.S. Energy Department has sampled too few of
the DU drums from its Savannah River cleanup in South Carolina - just 33 of
33,000.
At
least 5,408 drums of Savannah River DU are already buried at EnergySolutions
Inc.'s low-level radioactive waste disposal site in Tooele County. Another
5,000 drums are at the site awaiting additional disposal requirements before
burial, and two more Utah-bound train shipments are on standby in South
Carolina.
EnergySolutions
President Val Christensen, said his company "is providing a letter to the
Governor correcting HEAL's technical mischaracterizations."(13/1/10)
There's an awful lot of landslides in Brazil - best close down Angra I & II
Today we visit Brazil, courtesy of the BBC’s web
pages. Two nuclear
power stations near a city in southern Brazil hit by deadly landslides
may be temporarily shut down, the mayor has said.
Mayor
Tuca Jordao, of Angra dos Reis, said main roads had been blocked by landslides
and could obstruct any evacuation in the case of an emergency. He said the
plants - Angra I and Angra II - were not damaged or threatened but should be
shut down as a precaution.
Mr
Jordao said that with roads blocked there was no way to quickly evacuate the
city's inhabitants in case of a catastrophe at the nuclear plants.
"There
are no operational problems at Angra I and Angra II... but if landslides
persist in the hills, we'll need to shut them down," said Mr Jordao. (8/1/10)
Time to decide, Canada..
The
provincial government of Saskatchewan in Canada is expected to indicate soon
whether the province is open for business to nuclear power, according to a
report by Angela Hall on the pages of the Leader Post.
"We
want to clearly send a signal to the people of the province what the
government's thoughts are on the whole uranium
development going forward (and) on the power generation," said
Energy and Resources Minister Bill Boyd.
Boyd
said the government will formally respond to a report from the Uranium
Development Partnership that said the province should consider nuclear power
generation.
The
government's response is expected to offer a more definitive answer as to
whether nuclear power is currently seen as a viable option to pursue. The
Ontario-based company Bruce Power has been considering building nuclear
reactors in Saskatchewan and Alberta.
The
Alberta Conservative government this week stated it was open to receiving
private sector nuclear power proposals. But the Saskatchewan Party government
has seemed to cool to nuclear power in recent months, citing concerns over
costs.
New Cumbrian waste site 'First of its kind', apparently..
We were going to run this next week: oh, well...
Found on the pages of Materials Handling World web site. Detailed
plans for the creation of a low-level radioactive
waste disposal site in west Cumbria have been submitted to planners.
Endecom UK Ltd, a wholly-owned subsidiary of recycling and resource management
company SITA UK, handed the application to Cumbria County Council following
extensive public engagement, including public exhibitions, presentations,
leaflets and posters. The company proposes to establish a purpose-built and
expertly engineered disposal facility on the derelict former coal quarry for
the safe and secure storage of low and very low level radioactive waste. The
material will be made up of primarily construction and demolition waste, which
will mostly result from the decommissioning of Sellafield.
Development Manager Phil Holland said: "Our proposals for the Keekle Head
site have now been submitted following almost two years of extensive research,
planning, discussion and consultation. "It will be the first of its kind
in the UK and we are therefore delighted to have enlisted the support of
leading French radioactive waste management experts ANDRA, which has offered to
provide design and peer review to our plans. Having operated its facility very
successfully in recent years, it is well-placed to provide international
experience and expertise to the Keekle Head team."
If given the go-ahead, the site would be operated to the highest European
standards and best practise, ensuring no detrimental impact to health, the
environment or the community. It would also be regularly monitored by the
Environment Agency.
Red Wing & Monticello emergency services want a fistfull of dollars
Mike
Kaszuba, reporting for the StarTribune web site in
Minnesota, brings us this controversial environmental tale.
Thirty
times in the past four years, Red Wing police and fire fighters responded to
emergency calls at the Prairie Island
nuclear plant and in Monticello, a fire department designed for a town
of 11,000 people stood at the ready when a 13-ton valve box controlling steam
pressure collapsed at the nuclear power plant three years ago, shutting it down
for days.
Now,
with Xcel Energy winning approval to store more radioactive waste at the
plants, officials in Red Wing and Monticello say the added safety risks they
manage as homes to the state's two nuclear power plants are increasing. In a
move already drawing criticism, the two cities are asking that $13 million
currently sent each year by Xcel Energy to the federal government for
radioactive waste disposal instead be kept in Minnesota so that state and local
officials can start planning for how to manage the risk of a nuclear crisis.
The
proposal is stirring familiar passions over nuclear energy, pitting those who
worry that there is still no long-term solution on nuclear waste storage
against those who see nuclear power as an underused energy source with a long,
mostly safe, track record.
Volunteers needed to house Canadian waste in New Brunswick - interested?
Colin Woodard, writing for The Christian
Science Monitor scans the ‘Wanted’ ads..
If
they were to take out a classified ad, it would read something like this:
"Wanted: safe, willing home for
40,000 metric tons of nuclear waste. Must be Canadian. Phone for
details."
That's
what's on offer from Canada's Nuclear Waste Management Organization, the entity
charged with finding a site for the spent fuel produced by Canada’s 22 nuclear
reactors. While they don't advertise in newspapers, NWMO officials were in New
Brunswick province last month holding a public presentation to make communities
aware that they're looking for appropriate candidates to be considered as hosts
for the radioactive materials.
Canada,
like the United States, is seeking a long-term solution for storing spent
nuclear fuel, which will remain toxic for more than 10,000 years. But the
Canadian approach to finding a central depository site has fundamental
differences, most strikingly that potential host communities must volunteer.
Canada's
plan aims to avoid local resistance by requiring communities to ask to be
considered as hosts for an underground repository. Volunteers will be given
extensive information on the ecological risks and economic benefits of the
repository, which is expected to cost between $16 billion and $24 billion.
After public endorsement via referendum or other means, the community would
become a candidate for extensive technical review.
Looking for somewhere to dump some nuclear waste (again)? Head north, guv, to Lancashire
This was found on the pages of Lep News this week.
Concerns have been raised that radioactive
rubbish from across the UK will be dumped on the outskirts of a
Lancashire city. SITA UK wants permission for waste from more companies to be
disposed of at Clifton Marsh. Local councillors are worried this will mean
nuclear rubbish from all over the country being buried in Lancashire. If
approved, the application will allow more companies to use the landfill site
for "very low level radioactive waste" (VLLW) and "low level
radioactive waste" (LLW).
Colin Hardman, nuclear regulator for the Environment Agency, said permission
would need to be given before waste was transported to Clifton and said:
"The volumes are too small to justify anything other than road transport.
To some degree, waste can be shipped abroad for treatment, but that is a very
expensive operation."
He said radioactive waste arrived at the site in special containers and was
buried under a metre and a half of refuse. He said there were no concerns about
anything arriving at Clifton Marsh "covertly" because everything was
labelled and said: "The radiation levels are generally not a
problem."
The Environment Agency is expected to make a decision on the
application next year.
What's for dinner, then? Bears optional at Shattuck wildlife restoration site
Mark
Jaffe and the Denver Post get set for some ecological
restoration. Buried in the $33 million cleanup of the radioactive Shattuck Chemical
site in Denver, along South Bannock Street, was a $250,000 settlement for
ecological restoration.
That
settlement, with some regional cooperation, has quadrupled to $1 million that
will help refurbish Overland Pond Park and restore wetlands along the lower
South Platte River. "By partnering with local governments and community
groups, we've been able to use that settlement for some ambitious plans,"
said Laura Archuleta, an environmental contaminants specialist with the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service.
The
Shattuck Chemical Co., which salvaged uranium from defective fuel rods, closed
in 1982, leaving its 6-acre site contaminated with radioactivity. The site was
officially cleaned up under the federal Superfund program in 2006.
Because
the site is in the South Platte River watershed, the restoration efforts are
broad. About 280 acres of wetlands on the Eastern Plains will be restored at a
cost of $818,000, based on an initial $75,000 from the Shattuck settlement.
Adding funds and services to the project are government agencies, private
businesses and landowners, said Fish and Wildlife Service biologist Matt
Filsinger.
Among
those participating are Ducks Unlimited, the Colorado Division of Wildlife, the
Lower South Platte Water Conservancy District, the Harmony Ditch Co. and
Drakeland Farms.
Things get rather dusty in France - 39kg plutonium dusts-worth actually...
Peggy
Hollinger, reporting for the Financial Times, reports from
France for this one.
Andre-Claude
Lacoste, the head of France’s Nuclear
Safety Authority (ASN), was taken aback when French politicians
demanded a public inquiry into the country’s nuclear industry a few weeks ago.
He could not understand why his joint letter with two other European regulators
demanding design changes to a new-generation EPR reactor being built in France,
Finland and soon in the UK, should have prompted a storm in a country
traditionally supportive of nuclear power.
The
letter came in the wake of a series of recent incidents in France, not least
the discovery of 39kg of plutonium dust that had built up over 40 years in
fuel-making facilities run by the Atomic Energy Commission, the state nuclear
research body. The incidents prompted a call from Greenpeace for the “immediate
halt of work on the EPRs in Finland and France”.
France’s
independent watchdog insists there is no reason to worry about safety in the
country’s nuclear installations. The ASN records roughly 1,000 incidents a year
and Mr Lacoste says he does not have the impression that there has been an
“unusual accumulation of incidents” this year.
921 nuke warhead detonations cause underground water contamination
Ralph Vartabedian,
reporting for the LA Times web pages heads to Nevada for this one.
A sea of ancient water tainted by the Cold
War is creeping deep under the volcanic peaks, dry lake-beds and pine
forests covering a vast tract of Nevada.
Over 41 years, the federal government detonated 921 nuclear warheads
underground at the Nevada Test Site, 75 miles northeast of Las Vegas. Each
explosion deposited a toxic load of radioactivity into the ground and, in some
cases, directly into aquifers. When testing ended in 1992, the Energy
Department estimated that more than 300 million curies of radiation had been
left behind, making the site one of the most radioactively contaminated places
in the USA.
They have successfully pressured federal officials for a
fresh environmental assessment of the 1,375-square-mile test site, a step
toward a potential demand for monetary compensation, replacement of the lost
water or a massive cleanup.
In a study for Nye County, where the nuclear test site lies, it’s estimated
that the underground tests polluted 1.6 trillion gallons of water. That is as
much water as Nevada is allowed to withdraw from the Colorado River in 16 years
- enough to fill a lake 300 miles long, a mile wide and 25 feet deep.
Home Geiger Counters UV Torches & Marbles Bits & Bobs Nuclear Novelties Science Signs & Labels Nibbles Sources
Researcher puts his/her foot in it at Montana State - No? How about: What have you stepped in?
Robert Meeder, reporting for the Komu web
pages brings us this cautionary tale: always look where you are walking! A
researcher at Montana State University accidentally tracked phosphorus from a
lab to a few areas across campus recently.
An
unidentified lab researcher accidentally spilled phosphorus-32,
a radioactive isotope, at a Schlundt Annex laboratory. The researcher then
walked outside, unaware that the chemical spilled onto his or her shoes.
Department
workers used Geiger counters to locate radiation patches. Most of the radiation
was in a dirt filled area, at a corner outside Schlundt Annex,
the biochemistry building. The radioactive dirt will be stored for up to
six months before it can be disposed. Most of the researcher's footprints
have been sealed with black paint to stop any possible contamination from
spreading.
The
risk of airborne exposure to phosphorus-32 is minimal, but it is very dangerous
if ingested. The MU Environmental Health and Safety Department and biochemistry
students and teachers declined interviews. After the cleanup, an
investigation will determine if disciplinary action is necessary.
It's yet another 'best bring your geiger counter tale': this time we're heading west to Devon
Considering
a holiday in Devon? Best take a Geiger counter with you after reading this
little gem brought to us by those nice people at Ekklesia. Campaigners were expected to rally in
Plymouth at the weekend to demonstrate against plans for a nuclear waste plant in the
city centre. It is thought that if the plans go ahead, the plant would store
dismantled reactor components from the UK's nuclear submarines, possibly for
several decades until a long-term disposal site can be constructed.
People
are particularly concerned that the site is only 400 metres from a primary
school. There is also concern that both businesses and tourists could be driven
away if Plymouth is identified with the dumping of nuclear waste, thus
affecting the city's economy.
“This
will be risky work never undertaken before in the UK,” explained Dave Webb,
Vice-Chair of the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND). “The submarines
certainly need to be dismantled - however this should not be in the middle of a
city.” He suggested that, “Instead of blighting Plymouth with the reputation of
being Britain's only city-centre nuclear dump, the government should invest in
a green regeneration strategy for the city, providing long-term sustainable
jobs."
I was going to say 'water, water everywhere - best bring your geiger counter'; but I won't...
Mary
Manning,
reporting for the Las Vegas Sun, brings us this environmental report
from the Nevada Test Site.
Scientists
have found radioactive
tritium from nuclear tests in Nevada contaminating groundwater off the
Nevada Test Site for the first time. However, state and federal studies
indicated it would leave the nuclear site within 50 years.
A
groundwater sample taken in a new well drilled on Air Force land contained tritium
at about 12,500 picocuries per litre below the federal Environmental Protection
Agency Safe Drinking Water Act limit of 20,000 picocuries per litre. A
picocurie is a measure of radiation in liquid.
The
Energy Department predicted in February that groundwater contamination would
leave the Test Site boundary near Pahute Mesa, in the northwest corner of the
sprawling site about 85 miles northwest of Las Vegas.
Tritium
occurred naturally in lakes, rivers and public water supplies at between 5 and
25 picocuries per liter before nuclear weapons testing began in 1945 in New
Mexico. Tritium is formed in nature from cosmic rays striking hydrogen. It is
produced in nuclear explosions as well.
Current
plans are to drill six more test wells, at a cost of U$ 5m each, on and near
Pahute Mesa over the next two to three years, said Darwin Morgan, a spokesman
for the National Nuclear Security Administration, which operates the Test Site
for the Energy Department.
EPA to search for uranium 'hot spots' in Arizona
Cyndy
Cole, reporting on the pages of the Arizona Daily Sun
brings us this disturbing environmental tale.
A dump near Tuba City that has been leaching low levels of radioactive
waste into the shallow aquifer finally is getting some federal attention,
if not an actual cleanup yet.
The Environmental Protection Agency plans to fence off a remaining section of
an old dump, near two Hopi villages, and test for hot spots of radioactivity
close by. This includes one area where the agency says uranium levels in the
water exceed what's federally considered safe for drinking water by eight
times. Local villagers who believe their downstream springs are threatened have
long sought a total excavation of the dump.
Uranium-related waste found in the testing will be removed with heavy equipment
beginning in October, and 263 new testing holes will be dug to search for more.
"We're looking for a uranium source in the dump," said Leah Butler,
project manager for the EPA.
The dump, which operated uncontrolled and unlined from the 1950s to 1997, is
located a few miles from a former uranium mill. Altogether, eight test wells at
the former Tuba City dump show uranium levels exceeding what the EPA considers
safe for drinking water.
Home Geiger Counters UV Torches & Marbles Bits & Bobs Nuclear Novelties Science Signs & Labels Nibbles Sources
Green Party uncover leaks at Aldermaston
Robert
Warlow, reporting for the pages of Newbury Today, goes to
Aldermaston for this tale. Campaigners
have called for more transparency after details emerged of a radiation
leak at the Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE), Aldermaston.
Research
by Reading Green Party revealed that radioactive contamination was found in a
building at the site on June 29. Although radioactive material is not believed
to have spread beyond the site boundary, the Nuclear Installations Inspectorate
(NII) and the Environment Agency were informed of the incident, but the details
were not disclosed to the press and the public.
The
party’s prospective parliamentary candidate for Reading East, Rob White, said:
“AWE does not appear to have learnt any lessons following the July 2007 flood
that crippled the Burghfield nuclear warhead assembly plant. The company’s
instinctive reaction was to cover up the incident and this incident appears to
be more of the same with it not keeping people informed.” He added: “This
creates concerns and we are asking them to be more upfront and honest about
what risks are posed to the public.”
AWE
spokeswoman Rachel Whybrow said: “This minor event took place during routine
decommissioning work in a building on the AWE Aldermaston site. When an
internal contamination alarm sounded, monitoring of staff and a survey of the
area was carried out, which confirmed the event posed no threat to staff or the
wider public.
Possibility of uranium mine close to Grand Canyon upsets locals
Here’s something that I bet you didn’t know – nope, me neither! So
thanks to the Associated Press and the web pages of KSWT 13 in, I
believe, Yuma.
Environmental groups on Tuesday filed a 60-day notice that they
intend to sue the federal Bureau of Land Management over its decision to allow
a uranium mine to reopen north of the Grand Canyon.
Canadian mining firm Denison Mines Corp. says it could reopen its
Arizona 1 Mine about 20 miles from the canyon's northern border by the end of
the year. Dennison received the final state permit needed to move forward last
week.
The BLM says Denison has an approved mine plan and should be allowed
to resume operations. The mine closed about 20 years ago.
But the Centre for
Biological Diversity, Grand Canyon Trust and the Sierra Club argue that the BLM
failed to consider potential impacts to endangered species. They also say the
agency is relying on an outdated and inadequate environmental analysis.
Government plans upset residents of West Cumbria
The
following is taken from an article on the BBC’s web pages, written by Rachael
Howorth for Radio 4’s Open Country. Eleven potential sites for a new
generation of nuclear
power stations have been short-listed by the government for
development. Nine are next to existing reactors; just two are green-field sites
in West Cumbria.
The
prospect of skilled jobs coming to this isolated region appeals to some in the
area, but many of those running small businesses fear for their future.
Carl
Carter is the researcher for local Labour MP Jamie Reid. He is convinced that
the power station is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for this area to become
economically sustainable. If the power station were to go ahead there would be
the opportunity for well-paid, highly-skilled jobs.
However,
he suggests that the Kirksanton site is really a fallback option to be used only
if the site of the existing nuclear facilities at Sellafield, 20 miles up the
coast, proves impossible to build on.
For the sake of U$1bn, would you build a nuclear plant here? Progress Energy would..
The following is an editorial for the Tampa Bay Tribune
we found on the pages of Tampa Bay Online. Gov. Charlie Crist and the
Florida Cabinet's approval of a proposal to build a nuclear
plant in Levy County will cause some environmentalists to howl. But the
plant will produce clean energy and reduce the nation's dependence on oil.
Indeed, those conservationists rightly calling for Florida
to develop alternative energy sources should applaud the addition of the
nuclear facility, which will replace two coal-fired plants. Progress Energy's
Levy County facility will include two 1,100 mega-watt nuclear-powered units.
Florida needs to develop wind, solar, wave and other renewable energy sources.
It also needs to put far more emphasis on conservation, which offers enormous
opportunities for energy savings at little cost.
But nuclear must be part of the energy inventory if Florida
is to seriously reduce carbon emissions yet still meet the needs of some 18
million residents. And Florida Progress officials say nuclear power is far
cheaper to generate than power from other sources. They say the Levy plant will
save ratepayers $1 billion a year.
This is the first nuclear power plant to be approved in
Florida in 33 years. Consider how much more energy self-sufficient and how much
cleaner the state would be had not irrational fears of nuclear power halted its
utilization.
All packed up and ready to go to Utah - 14,800 drums of waste waiting to be moved
Thanks
to the Augusta Chronicle for the following. Nearly 15,000 drums of depleted
uranium oxide will be shipped from South Carolina for disposal in Utah
under a contract awarded by the Department of Energy.
The
14,800 drums of Savannah River Site (pictured) waste will be disposed of at
EnergySolutions’ facility about 70 miles west of Salt Lake City. The shipments
will take place over 14 months, although it was unclear last week when they
would start. The announcement, made by the Energy Department in mid-July, comes
as EnergySolutions fights an effort to place a moratorium on the disposal of
depleted uranium in Utah.
Depleted
uranium is classified as the least dangerous type of low-level radioactive
waste and has been disposed of for 18 years at the EnergySolutions' facility.
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has acknowledged, however, that the material
is different than other low-level waste because it becomes more radioactive
over time for hundreds of thousands of years. The NRC is now studying whether
new rules are needed for its disposal.
Spokesman
Mark Walker said EnergySolutions could also receive depleted uranium from
facilities in Oak Ridge, Paducah and Portsmouth over the next five years.
Hawaii 5-0 it’s not: more like Hawaii Oh no thanks to
‘migrating’ uranium
Found
this via Honolulu’s Star Bulletin web pages
A preliminary study has concluded the public is not
at risk from depleted
uranium at the Pohakuloa Training Area on Hawaii’s Big Island, the
military said.
The Army conducted the study as part of its licensing
application to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for a site-specific
environmental radiation - monitoring plan.
According to the report, only three pieces of the
radioactive material have been found at Pohakuloa (right) and the remainder, if any,
likely fell into cracks in the lava. The July 8 report says, "If any
significant quantity of DU was fired at PTA, it is expected to have quickly
migrated through the pahoehoe (smooth ropy lava) and a'a basalt (a type of
rocky cinder) flows and is no longer detectable at the surface."
The migration theory "made me giggle," said Mike
Reimer, a Big Island resident who served 10 years as head of research at the
Colorado School of Mines after a 25-year stint on a uranium project with the
U.S. Geological Survey. "On the basis of that study, they can't come to that
conclusion," Reimer said. "That document they sent to the NRC, I
think, was extremely superficial and often contradictory."
Home Geiger Counters UV Torches & Marbles Bits & Bobs Nuclear Novelties Science Signs & Labels Nibbles Sources
How much salt would you like with your Tritium sir?
Michael
Scott Moore, writing for the pages of Miller McCune, goes down
the mines for this report. Rock salt, at least while it's underground, has two
main properties: It can be soft and easy to mine, and it can form a watertight
seal. This helps explain why the West German government started fork-lifting
thousands of metal drums of "low-to-medium" radioactive waste into an
abandoned salt mine called Asse II during the 1960s.
The
mine plunges deep into the hills near Braunschweig (aka Brunswick), in the
centre of Germany, and politicians in Bonn regarded it during the Cold War as a
test site for storage of nuclear waste. An overhead layer of rock salt would
shield the mine from groundwater, and the shifting salt itself, over centuries,
would seal up any fractures and finally pack the nuclear waste in a safe
geological bed.
But
that's not what's happening. Around 12,000 liters of groundwater leak into the
mine every day. Some of it mixes with the radioactive waste. A few weeks ago,
the Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS) finally admitted that some
brine collected in Asse II had traces of tritium and caesium 137.
But
last year the German public learned that the group in charge of maintaining
Asse II at the time had known about the accumulation of suspect water since
2005 — and even tried to mitigate the threat to its employees by pumping it to
a deeper level of the mine. Heinz-Jörg Haury, spokesman for the Hemholtz
Institute for Scientific Research, tried to explain in mid-2008 why Helmholtz
had made no public announcement. "We believed no one was in danger, inside
or outside the mine," he said.
Thinking of going to the 2010 Olympics? Better take a Geiger Counter with you, then.
Ted Jeory and David
Jarvis, reporting for yesterday’s Sunday Express, bring us this (if true)
rather scary Olympic tale.
Thousands of tonnes of radioactive
waste is to be buried in a “nuclear bunker” next to the Olympic stadium
under construction in London. Contaminated soil found around old industrial works on the site will be
sealed in a radiation -proof concrete container just 400 yards from the
athletics track and 250 yards from Stratford International rail station. The massive bunker, the size of half a football pitch, will
be built under an approach ramp to a bridge across the River Lee inside the
Olympic Park and next to a site where new homes will be built after the 2012
games
A
total of 7,300 tonnes of toxic soil will be buried in the “disposal cell”
between the stadium, the station and the River Lee which drains into the
Thames. It will be lined with a plastic membrane and capped with 4ft of clay.
Liberal Democrat Olympic spokesman Don Foster MP
called on the Olympic Delivery Authority to reveal scientific proof that the
site would be safe for future generations.
A report from radiological consultants Nuvia told
the ODA the overall risk to site workers and future visitors was “negligible”
and within safety standards. But it warned any future housing “would need to be
designed to minimise radon intrusion”. And it added: “Water should not be abstracted
from below the disposal site to water vegetables, etc.”
Perhaps we should put this one under 'Environmental Stuff You Didn't Know'
Linda
Gunter, writing for the Ventura County Star web pages brings
us something we definitely didn’t know and I bet you didn’t, either.
July
16, 1979, just 14 weeks after the Three Mile Island reactor accident, and 34
years to the day after the Trinity atomic test, the small community of Church
Rock, N.M., became the scene of another nuclear
tragedy.
90
million gallons of liquid radioactive waste and 1,100 tons of solid mill wastes
burst through a broken dam wall at the Church Rock uranium mill facility,
creating a flood of deadly effluents that permanently contaminated the Rio
Puerco River.
Five
weeks after the spill occurred, the mine and mill operator, United Nuclear
Corp., were back in business at Church Rock as if nothing had happened. Why is the Church Rock spill - that washed
into gullies, contaminated fields and the animals that grazed there, and made
drinking water deadly - so anonymous in the annals of our nuclear history?
Perhaps the answer lies in where it took place and whom it affected.
Church
Rock was a small farming community of Native Americans, mainly Navajo, eking
out a subsistence living off the arid South-Western land. Nearby,
several-hundred-million gallons of liquid uranium mill tailings were sitting in
a pond waiting for evaporation to leave behind solid tailings for storage. The
long-term effects of this enormous level of radioactive contamination are not
yet known, given that health effects resulting from radiation exposure can take
decades to appear and can affect future generations.
Obama cancels recycling plans - but don't say anything...
Geoff Brumfiel, writing
for Nature.com’s web pages brings us this. Earlier this week, the
administration of President Barack Obama quietly cancelled plans for a
large-scale facility to recycle
nuclear fuel. The move may prove a fatal blow
to the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP) set up by previous president
George W. Bush.
The
US Department of Energy (DoE) set up GNEP in early 2006 to tackle the problems
of nuclear proliferation and nuclear waste. As nuclear power spreads, some
nations will want the ability to produce their own uranium fuel through
enrichment - a process that can also be
used to create material for nuclear weapons. The Bush administration hoped to
limit proliferation of enrichment technologies by creating a guaranteed fuel
supply for non-nuclear weapons states. Through GNEP, countries with enrichment
plants, including France, Russia, and the United States, will guarantee a
supply of fuel to countries that agree not to develop their own enrichment
capabilities.
Once
the fuel is used, the supplying nations will take it back and 'reprocess' it
for use in their own commercial reactors. Plutonium and unused uranium isotopes
can be chemically extracted and put into new fuel pellets that in turn can be
used in specially designed reactors. France, Japan, the United Kingdom and
Russia already reprocess fuel for commercial use, although the United States hasn't
done so since the 1970s.
Home Geiger Counters UV Torches & Marbles Bits & Bobs Nuclear Novelties Science Signs & Labels Nibbles Sources
Looks lovely, doesn't it? Wrong - there's plutonium in them thar hills!
LeRoy
Moore, reporting for the Daily Camera’s web pages, tells a chilling
environmental tale. The most contentious issue regarding the Rocky Flats
National Wildlife Refuge in Colorado is the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(FWS) plan to open the refuge for hiking, biking, picnicking, school field
trips and other activities. Before public access is allowed at the refuge, the
surface soil needs to be sampled for plutonium content. This type of sampling,
which has never been done at the Rocky Flats site, will demonstrate whether or
not plutonium
is present in breathable particles - its most dangerous form.
Newcomers
to the Denver-Boulder area may not be aware that for almost four decades the
Rocky Flats nuclear bomb factory located about eight miles south of Boulder
produced the explosive plutonium "pit" at the core of every nuclear
warhead in the U.S. arsenal. Routine operations as well as major fires and
accidents released very fine particles of plutonium to the environment both on
and off the plant site.
Inhaling
or ingesting plutonium or taking tiny particles into the body through an open
wound can result in cancer, disruption of the immune system, or harm to the
gene pool. Because plutonium has a half-life of 24,110 years, its presence in
the environment in particles so small they can attach to dust poses a permanent
danger.
Production
was halted in 1989 after the FBI raided the plant to collect evidence of
environmental lawbreaking. Plutonium pit production ended permanently in 1992
when the Rocky Flats mission was changed from production to cleanup of a badly
contaminated site.
Duck & cover - those 'muddy' wasps have left radioactive nests laying around Hanford
Shanon Dininny, reporting for the Associated
Press brings you, my fellow wasp haters, a tale to chill the blood! If
workers cleaning up the nation's most contaminated nuclear site at Hanford
didn't have enough to worry about, now they've got to deal with radioactive
wasp nests.
Mud
dauber wasps built the nests, which have been largely abandoned by their
flighty owners, in holes at south-central Washington's Hanford nuclear
reservation in 2003. That's when workers finished covering cleaned-up waste
sites with fresh topsoil, native plants and straw to help the plants grow —
inadvertently creating perfect ground cover for the insects to build their
nests. Nearby cleanup work also provided a steady supply of mud, which the
wasps used as building material.
Today,
the nests, which could number in the thousands, are "fairly highly
contaminated" with radioactive isotopes, such as cesium and cobalt, but
don't pose a significant threat to workers digging them up. "You don't
know what you're going to run into, and this is probably one of the more
unusual situations," said Todd Nelson, spokesman for Washington Closure
Hanford, the contractor hired to clean up the area under the oversight of the
U.S. Department of Energy.
The
wasps largely built their nests in a 75-acre area around H reactor, pulling the
mud from the bottom of a storage basin that once held irradiated nuclear fuel. (15/06/09)
Erm, we've just spilt some Tritium - but, not to worry, it didn't go anywhere
Kim
Janssen, writing for Chicago Breaking News, brings us a
rather non-story – but worrying nevertheless.
A radioactive leak at Exelon's Dresden
nuclear power plant has been contained and isn't a risk to public
health, authorities said recently. Leaked tritium (a radioactive by-product of nuclear reaction that can cause
cancer and birth defects) was found Saturday during routine tests at the Grundy
County plant, according to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
The
leak is not believed to have left the 1,700-acre plant site. Exelon officials
said leaked tritium has not entered the public water supply. But the company
hasn't found the cause or source of the leak, which was discovered in a
monitoring well and storm sewers at the 37-year-old plant, the oldest
privately-financed nuclear reactor in the United States and not far from the
Kankakee and Des Plaines Rivers.
Workers
were digging in the "general area" where a waste pipe is believed to
have failed and are testing other wells at the plant, Exelon spokeswoman Krista
Lopykinski said. "There's no danger to public or staff safety.”
But
Paul Gunther, of anti-nuclear campaign group Beyond Nuclear, said Exelon has a
history of "trivializing uncontrolled and unmonitored" tritium leaks.
"Where is that contaminated water going to be 10 years from now?"
Gunther said. "Groundwater can move and its movement is hard to predict."(12/6/09)
Where do we store spent fuel? NIMBY row rumbles on in the US
Lynn
Edward Weaver, reporting for the Ledger’s web pages in Lakeland,
Florida, brings us this. The U.S. has already committed $24 billion to build an
underground repository for nuclear waste at Yucca
Mountain in Nevada, according to the US Department of Energy.
Florida
alone has forked over $743 million. Unfortunately, the Obama administration has
submitted a budget to Congress that would sharply curtail funding for the
repository project, and indications are that its future is very much in doubt.
The
administration's decision to cancel a DOE program aimed at reviving the
recycling of spent-nuclear fuel has confused matters further. The real question
is not "is there a better site for a repository?" but rather
"why not leave the spent fuel where it is and compensate utilities for
keeping it?"
About
60,000 metric tons of spent fuel - often mistakenly called nuclear waste - is
stored at nuclear power plant sites in 35 states, mainly in concrete-and-steel
dry casks. The spent fuel is safe-and-secure, and it could remain where it is
for another few decades at least. Or until the spent fuel can be reprocessed to
produce more electricity, as is being done successfully and safely in other
countries, such as France, Great Britain and Japan.
License delays in Levy County put building works on hold
Our
thanks to Reuters for this update. Progress
Energy's Florida utility will
delay the construction timeline for its U$14 billion nuclear plant in Levy
County and scale back early charges to pay for the plant, the company said
recently.
Florida's
second-largest utility said a 20-month delay in the construction schedule for
two 1,105-megawatt, AP1000 reactors will push commercial operation of the first
unit to 2018, rather than 2016 as currently envisioned. A second reactor at the
site could begin operation about 2020.
The
schedule change follows a ruling by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission that
prevents certain excavation and foundation work until Progress receives a
license to construct and operate the plant, the utility said in a statement.
Progress
had hoped to proceed with the foundation work ahead of the issuance of a
license, expected by early 2012.
Home Geiger Counters UV Torches & Marbles Bits & Bobs Nuclear Novelties Science Signs & Labels Nibbles Sources
New storage plans at Sequoyah upset residents in Oklahoma
Sally Maxwell, Managing
Editor at the Sequoyah County Times, brings us this clean-up tale. The
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has approved Sequoyah Fuels’ plan to
dispose of contaminated
materials in an on-site cell, a plan opposed by some residents near the
Gore-area plant in Oklahoma. John Ellis, Sequoyah Fuels president, said the NRC
approved the plant’s on-site disposal site Monday, “after 16 years and two
months.”
The plant, which at one time processed uranium to use in fuel rods for nuclear
power plants, was closed in 1993 after it was found that portions of the plant
and groundwater were contaminated.
Sequoyah Fuels and its parent company, General Atomics, have been working to
meet the requirements to close the plant ever since. Last week, Ellis said that
the proposed on-site disposal cell will cover about 11 acres in the centre of
the property, which is about 60 acres now. The completed cell will cover about
17 acres, including its slopped sides, and will be about 50 feet tall.
The disposal is expected to cost General Atomics about $28 million and the NRC
has approved the five-year disposal plan for financial reasons, so that the
disposal may be paid for over that time period.
Get the map out, we're changing direction at Eagle Rock
This
comes from World Nuclear News’
web pages. Areva Enrichment Services (AES) has submitted a
"roadmap" to US regulators defining changes it plans to make to
its licence application in order to double the capacity of the Eagle
Rock Enrichment Facility (EREF).
AES submitted its licence application for the centrifuge uranium enrichment
plant to be built at Bonneville County, Idaho, at the end of 2008. On 31 March
2009 the company informed the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) that it
intended to revise the application to double the capacity of the plant from the
originally planned 3.3 million SWU (separative work units, the unit of
measurement for uranium enrichment) to 6.6 million SWU per year.
AES said that it had decided to revise the application to give it the
flexibility to build a bigger plant if market conditions warrant but confirmed
that it does not have any firm plans to do so. "In recent months,
AES' confidence has increased regarding the construction of new reactors both
in the United States and other countries," the company told NRC in its
letter forewarning them of the revision.
Not a very good start to Earth Day, Oyster Creek
Todd B Bates brings us
this environmental tale. Exelon is investigating whether a storage tank
or piping may be the "leak source" responsible for an elevated level
of radioactive
tritium found in water at the Oyster Creek nuclear power plant ,
according to a federal official.
Exelon
owns the plant, which received a 20-year license renewal from the U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission last week. Workers detected 102,000 picocuries of tritium
per litre - five times the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency standard for
drinking water - in water in a concrete vault. A picocurie (in case you didn’t
know) is a measure of radioactivity.
"Based
on sampling and analysis of ground water monitoring wells in the vicinity,
Exelon is investigating the potential that the leak source may be the condensate
storage tank or associated piping," according to Neil A. Sheehan, an NRC
spokesman.
Sellafield's B30 is contender for Europe's most contaminated buildings list
Robin McKie, reporting
for The Observer, brings us this worrying tale from Sellafield. Last
week the government announced plans for a new generation of nuclear plants. But
Britain is still dealing with the legacy of its first atomic installation at
Sellafield - a toxic
waste dump in one of the most contaminated buildings in Europe.
Building
B30 is a large, stained, concrete edifice that stands at the centre of
Sellafield. Surrounded by a
three-metre-high fence that is topped with razor wire, encased in scaffolding
and riddled with a maze of sagging pipes and cabling, it would never be a
contender to win an architectural prize. Yet B30 has a powerful claim to fame,
albeit a disturbing one: It is the most hazardous industrial building in
Western Europe.
Piles
of old nuclear reactor parts and decaying fuel rods, much of them of unknown
provenance and age, line the murky, radioactive waters of the cooling pond in
the centre of B30. Down there, pieces of contaminated metal have dissolved into
sludge that emits heavy and potentially lethal doses of radiation. It is an unsettling place, though B30 is
certainly not unique. There is Building B38 next door, for example - the second
most hazardous industrial building in Europe.
Shake, rattle and roll - Hanford hit by earthquake 'swarm'
Eric Mortenson, reporting for
The Oregonian, gets all shook up with reports of multiple quakes at
Hanford
It's
been a jittery week at eastern Washington's Hanford
Nuclear Reservation, where more than 100 small earthquakes have been
detected in the past seven days.
The
quakes are part of an earthquake "swarm" that has puzzled scientists
since it began at the first of the year. As of Friday, monitors at Hanford had
detected more than 700 earthquakes since Jan. 4, said Alan Rohay, senior
scientist and seismologist with Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, which
operates at Hanford.
The
quakes haven't disturbed the extensive stores of radioactive waste at Hanford
or interfered with cleanup operations there. The plant processed plutonium for
nuclear weapons during World War II and the Cold War. Highly contaminated
liquid material is stored in underground tanks that have a history of leaks,
and critics are wary of leaks or spills that could migrate to the nearby
Columbia River.
Home Geiger Counters UV Torches & Marbles Bits & Bobs Nuclear Novelties Science Signs & Labels Nibbles Sources
There's plenty of fish in the sea - but not at Dounreay
Just in case you were thinking about a spot of fishing in
Scotland, John Ross, reporting for the Scotsman has this
cautionary (fishy) tale.
A ban on seafood coming from an area near the Dounreay
nuclear site is to stay in place, following a Food Standards Agency review. The
restriction, preventing the removal of fish and shellfish from a 2km exclusion
zone, was imposed in 1997 after the discovery of radioactive particles on the
seabed.
The order, under the Food and Environment Protection Act, was to ensure any
seafood contaminated by irradiated nuclear fuel did not enter the food chain.
Last year, Dounreay began work using remotely operated vehicles to remove the
worst of the particles that have caused concern for more than quarter of a
century. Up to £25 million will be spent on covering an area the size of 60
football pitches and on monitoring up to the 2020s.
The FSA examined the existing ban in light of the work, but concluded that the
restricted area should remain in place while the work on the seabed is going on
and be reviewed once it is complete. The agency said that, with the
restrictions in place, the risk to food safety remains extremely small.
Vermont Yankee clean? Vermonters don't think so...
The
following environmental report comes courtesy of Julie Elmore, reporting
for the Burlington Free Press web pages recently. Vermonters have been
witnessing their own magic show on the energy stage in Vermont recently, with
the Legislature and ratepayers as its audience. Throughout the past year, Gov.
Douglas, utilities, Entergy and corporate special interest groups have
presented a steady supply of smoke and mirrors to create an illusion -- the
illusion that Vermont
Yankee is cheap, clean, green and reliable, and still critical to
Vermont's energy portfolio for the next two decades.
Cue
the smoke: Vermont utilities continually publicize their efforts to increase
renewable energy and conservation as part of their future energy plans. Yet,
their plans show a small increased investment in renewable energy over a
25-year time span and continued reliance on Vermont Yankee during this same
25-year period.
Cue
the mirrors: Vermonters are told we receive cheap and clean energy due in large
part to the cost of purchasing power from Vermont Yankee. In fact, this claim
is based on an old contract and doesn't account for the fact that Vermont
Yankee will cost a lot more after 2012. Nor does it account for the dangers and
cost of cleaning up nuclear waste along the Connecticut River. Nor does it
reflect the intensively high CO2 emissions from uranium mining. Where compared
to renewable alternatives, energy generated from the entire nuclear fuel cycle
releases four to five times more CO2 and is the most polluting energy source,
bar none.
Now, where did we dispose of that Cesium, Cobolt...? It's here somewhere
David
Gutierrez, staff writer for Natural News brings us this.
Hospitals
have become a major source of nuclear waste in the United States, producing and
storing millions of radioactive
materials each year with no long-term disposal plan. Experts
increasingly fear that such waste could pose health hazards or be stolen by
terrorists and used to build dirty bombs.
"Instead of safely secured in one place, it's stored in thousands of
places in urban locations all over the United States," said nuclear waste
consultant Rick Jacobi.
Hospitals and other health facilities use radioactive material for a variety of
functions. For example, radiation from cobalt and powdered cesium is used to
sterilize blood and medical equipment, while cobalt is also used to kill
diseased brain tissue.
The federal government has long had a policy that individual states should
build sites where radioactive waste produced in that state can be stored and
disposed of, but failed to create penalties for states that did not comply. As
a consequence, only three such radioactive waste facilities exist in the United
States.
A fishy tale brewing at Prairie Island nuke site
John
Weiss, writing for the Post
– Bulletin web pages brings us this “fishy” tale.
The
Department of Natural Resources is waiting to read next month's
draft environmental impact statement for expanding the capacity and life of the
Prairie Island Nuclear Power Plant near Red Wing, Minnesota, before it can tell
how the project will affect fishing on the Mississippi River.
But
it already is concerned about more warm water, both in winter and summer. The
plant's license to operate one of two reactors will expire in four years, while
the other will end in five years. The plant is 7 river miles above Red Wing.
Xcel
Energy is asking for state and federal approvals to continue operating through
2034 and also expand capacity from the present 1,100 megawatts to 1,264,
according to documents filed with the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission.
Jack Enblom, a DNR senior aquatic biologist, said while Xcel doesn't think it
will exceed its current limit on warm water in summer and winter, he's not as
certain the river can absorb the extra 10 percent more heat.
French flagship reactor 7 times more hazardous, waste-wise - possibly
Despite the French government's global marketing of its
flagship European
Pressurised Reactor (EPR) as cheap and safe, nuclear energy is rapidly
becoming the most expensive way to produce electricity, and its highly
radioactive waste poses an ever-increasing problem.
Greenpeace has
recently uncovered evidence that nuclear waste from the European Pressurised
Reactor (EPR) - the flagship of the French nuclear industry - will be up to
seven times more hazardous than waste produced by existing nuclear reactors,
increasing costs and the danger to health and the environment.
The
EPR is designed to extract more energy from nuclear fuel than any commercially
operating reactor in order to maximise electricity output. This "high
burn-up" method causes the amount of readily-released radioactive
substances in spent fuel to increase disproportionately. The storage of the
hazardous waste will be more costly for a range of reasons - including an
increase in the repository size due to the greater distance needed between
canisters.
No
appropriate waste facilities exist - or are even being planned - in
Finland, France or any of the countries considering buying the EPR (including
the UK, the US, Canada and India).
Home Geiger Counters UV Torches & Marbles Bits & Bobs Nuclear Novelties Science Signs & Labels Nibbles Sources
You want to put a nuke power station where, Ed?
Here’s a little gem for you found on the BBC’s new
pages. An outright ban on locating new nuclear power
stations in areas of the UK that are susceptible to earthquakes has
been lifted by the government. Ministers said the UK's earthquake risk was
"modest" and power stations could be built to withstand any activity.
The
nuclear industry now has two months to nominate potential new sites. The UK
does not sit over a major seismic fault zone, meaning earthquakes are
relatively rare and mild. The areas of highest risk are thought to be along the
west of England, Scotland and Wales.
Despite
being urged by some to keep the ban, the government ruled that some seismic
risk should not automatically stop a site getting past the first stages of
consideration. Nuclear developers will be able to apply for planning permission
from next year and ministers will then announce which sites have been deemed
"strategically suitable".
Energy
and Climate Change Secretary Ed Miliband told the Nuclear Development Forum on
Tuesday: "We'll be judging each site that gets nominated against the
criteria we have set out and there will be plenty of opportunities for local
authorities and the public to have their say on the options tabled."
New nuke power station on way for Anglesey - maybe...
Tomos
Livingstone, writing for the Western Mail brings us this tale
from Anglesey. A new nuclear power
station could be built next to the existing Wylfa station on Anglesey, the
Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) said recently.
The
NDA said it was “nominating” land near Wylfa – together with three sites in
England – for consideration under the Government’s Strategic
Siting Assessment process. Any new nuclear site would be built by a
private firm, rather than by the NDA itself
But
new nuclear build is highly controversial, and any development at Wylfa is
likely to meet opposition from some MPs. Richard Waite, the NDA’s acting chief
executive, said: “Our aim is to secure value from our assets for the benefit of
the taxpayer. To achieve this, we expect to nominate land into the SSA process.
Particularly for Anglesey, such a move has the added benefit of contributing
towards the socio-economic aims of those communities.”
Polish state-owned nuke group seek partner for new build due 2020
This comes in its entirety from
the pages of the Warsaw Business Journal that may have passed you by.
Polish
power group, PGE plans to construct two nuclear power plants at the capacity of
3,000 megawatts each. State-owned power group, Polska Grupa
Energetyczna (PGE) plans to construct two nuclear power plants, each with
the capacity of 3,000 megawatts, the company’s chief Tomasz Zadroga said
recently during a press conference.
According
to Zadroga, PGE estimated that the cost of 1 megawatt of capacity would be
between €2.5 and €3 (zl.10.3 and zl.12.41) million. “We want for energy to flow
from the first plant in 2020. From our analysis, this is realistic,” Zadroga
said.
The
energy security strategy approved by the Polish government last week aims at
one or two nuclear power plants to be built by 2020, as part of a consortium
with a foreign partner. Prime Minister Donald Tusk said that nine
locations are being considered for the plants locations.
Faulty sump caused waste leakage into ground over 14 years
Here is a worrying environmental tale for the good folk of
Essex, thanks to the BBC. Operators of a nuclear power station in Essex
have been accused of allowing radioactive waste to seep into the ground for 14
years. The Environment Agency claims waste leaked from a unit at Bradwell power station,
now decommissioned, between 1990 and 2004.
Magnox
Electric Ltd denies 11 breaches of radioactive waste disposal laws. Mr Harris,
prosecuting, told Chelmsford Crown Court the power station was no longer
running. "The case concerns the disposal of liquid radioactive waste which
leaked to the ground from a sump at the site of what is now the former Bradwell
nuclear power station," he said.
He
went on to say: "These leaks occurred on a number of occasions between
1990 and 2004. They were caused by a combination of poor original design of the
sump and no routine inspection or maintenance until after the leak was discovered."
Judge
Peter Fenn warned jurors not to carry out private research. "Resist the
temptation to go down to your local library or on to the internet to conduct
research into nuclear physics or nuclear power stations," he said.
Stay alert, it's siren testing day at Oakridge
Never let it be said that we don’t do our bit for
public services. Here is a heads-up for
the people of Tennessee, courtesy of the OakRidger’s web pages.
The
U. S. Department of Energy's Public Warning Siren System will be tested today
in the areas surrounding the Department's Oak Ridge Reservation.
The sirens will be tested between 11 am and 2 pm Central. People in these
areas during the test will hear a siren for three to five minutes. The sirens
are located near the DOE's East Tennessee Technology Park, Y-12 National
Security Complex, and Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
The sirens are intended to provide immediate notification of an emergency to
people who are within an approximate two-mile radius of DOE's ORR. The
33,725-acre ORR is located in Anderson and Roane counties.
In the event of an actual emergency, the sirens will be sounded. When citizens
hear the sirens, they should go inside, close all windows and ventilation
systems, and listen to radio or television for public health and safety-related
information.
The DOE Public Warning Siren System is tested on the first Wednesday of each
month. This effort is consistent with testing of warning systems around the
Tennessee Valley Authority's nuclear power plants.
A website has been established that provides information to the public on what
to do in case of an emergency at the DOE's ORR and can be found at : http://www.oakridge.doe.gov/emergency
- this will take you to the relevant information page. By the way, at this time
there is no emergency at OakRidge.
Contamination still a problem at Maralinga test site
Max Blenkin writing for the Herald Sun
web pages brings us this sorry environmental report.
In the now well-known nuclear testing program, Britain
exploded seven atomic
bombs at the Maralinga, South Australia, test site between September
1956 and October 1957.This left
Maralinga holding a quantity of bomb-grade plutonium, and no ideas what to do
with it.
For the government of Malcolm Fraser, this
represented a series of problems. It wasn't very well guarded, it wasn't
especially secret and it wasn't clear the British government would want to take
it back.
Cabinet papers for 1978 - released by the National Archives of Australia under
the 30-year rule - show the government did manage to persuade the British
government to take back their leftovers, provided the entire operation was kept
top secret.
However, most nuclear waste on the site
stemmed from so-called minor tests conducted between June 1955 and May 1963.
This included testing of nuclear bomb initiators and a series of experiments
termed Vixen B, conducted in 1960-63, to determine what might happen to a
nuclear bomb in an intense fire, such as might occur in an aircraft crash.
A history of the site prepared by the Australian Radiation Protection and
Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA) said the trials involved negligible fission
yield. But they did produce jets of molten, burning plutonium, extending
hundreds of metres into the air. After each trial the plutonium was carried by
the wind in long plumes and deposited large distances from the site.
Home Geiger Counters UV Torches & Marbles Bits & Bobs Nuclear Novelties Science Signs & Labels Nibbles Sources
R2 and 3PO clean up in Wales
Whilst
the urge to use yet another image of R2D2 and C3PO is very strong (How could I resist?) Hywel
Trewyn reporting for the Daily Post brings us this environmental
tale. 35 tonnes of radioactive waste have been retrieved by robots at the
former Trawsfynydd
nuclear power station in North Wales.
The
first stage in the plant’s clean-up finished two months early with a saving of
£473,222. This is the first waste retrieval project of its kind, using remote
control vehicles, to be completed on a UK nuclear power station.
Staff
at the site operated by Magnox North on behalf of the site’s owner, the Nuclear
Decommissioning Authority, completed work to empty underground vaults
containing “miscellaneous activated components” (MAC).
Site
Director Dr Phil Sprague said: “MAC consists mainly of steel and graphite
components from within the nuclear reactors which became highly radioactive
during the generating life of the power station. Retrieval of the waste was
carried out in extremely challenging conditions, in an area containing high
levels of radioactive contamination which could not be directly accessed by the
site’s decommissioning teams.”
Dial R for radium 226: old dials may be responsible for US contaminent find
Teresa
Rochester, reporting for the Ventura County Star web pages
brings us this environmental report from California. Tests have uncovered
radioactive contaminants in an open-air burn pit, already rife with chemical
pollutants, at the Santa Susana Field Laboratory, according to state regulatory
officials.
Low
levels of radium-226
and plutonium were discovered during recent testing said Norman Riley,
the field lab project director for California's Department of Toxic Substances
Control.
"These
are very low levels of radionuclides, and certainly the discovery of radium is
not that surprising. It's fairly common to find radium in landfills. We don't
know if we found all that there is to find, and it doesn't answer the question
of where it came from."
One
possibility for the source is old radio or instrument dials, or it might have
been used in experiments. The Field Lab, which is currently owned by Boeing Co.
and formerly owned by Rocketdyne, is a former rocket engine and nuclear test
site in the hills south of Simi Valley.
Boeing
officials notified the state in October about the discovery and, in an e-mail
update about the burn pit, wrote: "The levels detected are low in
comparison to radiation from a single chest X-ray."
Ontario Power want to bury low-level waste in local limestone
The
following environmental tale comes courtesy of the pages of The Canadian
Press. As plans progress for a radioactive-waste site buried deep in
Ontario limestone, the federal nuclear
watchdog says the related safety research is full of holes. Ontario Power Generation wants a licence by
2012 to bury low-to intermediate-level radioactive waste at its Bruce nuclear
plant near Kincardine.
It's
the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission's job to approve or reject that
application. But environmental critics and geoscientific experts are asking how
the federal regulator can credibly assess crucial safety issues - especially
when the commission itself says it lacks up-to-date, independent research.
"Compared
to the European countries, research in Canada on geological disposal in
sedimentary rocks is lagging behind by decades," the nuclear regulator
said. Consultants will study the extent to which radioactive contaminants could
be diffused through tiny pores in the 680 metres of sedimentary limestone under
which they're to be buried.
Alice goes nuclear at thought of 1km long train
approaching town
Daniel Burdon, writing for the Centralian Advocate brings us this disturbing
tale from Alice Springs. Trainloads of radioactive
material up to 1km long would pass through Alice Springs every day by
2016, under a plan put before the town council last week. The proposed expansion of BHP
Billiton's Olympic Dam mine in South Australia could result in the ore being
ferried north by rail. The train would carry copper concentrate and trace
uranium (which would not be highly refined).
Greens
have slammed the proposal, citing major concerns including possible
derailments, radioactive dust escaping from "closed wagons" and
long-term social and environmental effects.
At
Alice Springs Town Council's Ordinary Council Meeting, BHP Billiton's Olympic
Dam's Expansion project public affairs advisor Anita Poddar said the plan would
see four times the amount of ore mined from the site. If the company passed
environmental assessments by the South Australian, Territorian and Federal
Governments, all of it would travel through the town and on to Port Darwin.
Ms Poddar said the company hoped to have its environmental impact statements
completed by April with approvals to proceed, possibly by 2010.
Oz uranium workers' toxic exposure "spot on the average"
This report comes from the pages of abc Australia. An
independent radiation safety expert from Queensland (who was called in to speak
to Ranger uranium
mine employees this week about exposure levels) says management is
reassessing its procedures. The mine's
union expressed concern after a dirty clean up job at the mine recently.
Mark
Sonter said the mine's general manager asked him to provide an independent
perspective to employees on radiation levels after about a dozen men were
exposed to uranium oxide when clearing out a hopper in October. He went on to say that the six men tested
showed a very low level of chemical intake which probably happened when they
washed after the job: "By getting a bit on their lips while showering
after or brushing a still dirty hand on their face while showering or something
like that.”
The
men were told that the five micrograms of uranium per litre of urine that were
detected is far below what constitutes a health or radiation risk. "The average is that they all get about
a tenth of the annual limit or maybe a bit more, so our uranium miners up here
in the Territory are spot on the average for radiation workers throughout
Australia," he said.
Home Geiger Counters UV Torches & Marbles Bits & Bobs Nuclear Novelties Science Signs & Labels Nibbles Sources
If you're going out to play kids, remember to suit up...
This environmental tale comes
courtesy of Svetlana Osadchuk, reporting for the Moscow Times.
What children in a densely populated eastern Moscow suburb used to
think of as a good little hill to play and toboggan on has turned out to be a radioactive
waste dump — one that local residents and ecologists say could spill
over and contaminate a larger area.
The radiation-emitting dump (which was unearthed during incomplete cleanup
works) poses a danger to Muscovites, said Vladimir Chuprov, head of Greenpeace
Russia's Energy Unit. He said the works, suspended half a year ago, were not
done properly, leaving the site in a potentially dangerous state.
"The bad news is that the water has flowed in," Chuprov said.
"This water might contain radioactive materials. Liquid is much more
difficult to recover and keep from spreading."
Chuprov added that recent checks of the adjacent area by Greenpeace revealed
radiation levels of up to 43 microroentgen per hour, compared to normal levels
of 10 to 15 microroentgen per hour — possibly because of the fact that the
truck wash site was not equipped with drain channels and a water collector, he
said.
US draft study considers nuke power plant fuel re-use.
Annette Cary, writing
for the Tri-City Herald, brings us this report about a new draft environmental
study for the Global Nuclear
Energy Partnership on the impacts of expanding nuclear energy that
favours reprocessing fuel that has been used in nuclear power plants rather
than using it only once.
The draft study, or programmatic
environmental impact statement, looks at alternatives to the practice of using
nuclear fuel once and then sending it to a deep geological repository, such as
Yucca Mountain, Nevada (pictured). It did not pick one option as preferred, saying only
that the Department of Energy preferred to close the fuel cycle, or reuse fuel.
The study also did not narrow sites for researching or reprocessing fuel, but
did include information about areas, including Hanford, that might be
appropriate for nuclear projects.
The study projects that electricity use in the
U.S. could increase by about 40 percent by 2030. The DOE is looking at ways to
support the expansion of nuclear energy production, which now supplies 19 % of
the nation's electricity, while reducing the risks of nuclear proliferation and
the impacts of disposing of nuclear fuel in geologic repositories.
No dear, it's a meltdown warning, not telemarketers...
Yet another siren story; this time it’s courtesy of
Joseph Dougherty reporting for the Desert News web pages. The Clearfield City Council in Utah, recently
approved the purchase of three sirens to sound in the community in case of an
emergency. It's part of a community
emergency preparedness package begun in 2007 with the purchase of a
low-wattage AM radio station that can give residents information they need in
an emergency, said Clearfield Mayor Don Wood.
The
sirens, which should be installed in Clearfield in the next six to eight weeks,
are designed to broadcast a sound that will direct residents to turn on AM
1680. Wood said his city already employs a reverse 911 system that allows
dispatchers to target a region of the city and send out an automated phone call
with instructions and information.
But
people may not receive the 911 call: during one drill some residents confused
the reverse 911 call for telemarketers and hung up, so the city wanted to set
up another notification system.
Clearfield
may be one of the most deserving cities for a siren system. The city has Hill
Air Force Base nearby (pictured above) where fighter
jets are stationed and receive routine maintenance.
"It's
like insurance," Wood said. "You hope you never have to use it."
More pollution problems stateside - this time in Colorado
This is another environmental tale from the US;
this time from the Associated Press and picked up by the Examiner web pages.
Federal researchers have begun a public health review in Canon City, Colorado,
amid renewed concerns about pollution from a closed uranium
mill.
The
study, by the Health and Human Services Department, is examining potential
exposure to pollution from the Cotter Corp. mill and the possible health risks.
"We're not saying these (potential health impacts) were caused by the
contamination," said environmental scientist Teresa Foster. "We're
not at the point where we can make that determination. We're taking the
community's concerns very seriously."
Lakewood-based
Cotter says previous studies concluded that slightly elevated cancer rates in
Canon City were not statistically significant. Company officials say the new
concerns might be an attempt to head off a possible reopening of the mill. The
mill was designated a federal Superfund cleanup site 24 years ago because of
radioactive contamination of air and groundwater drifting away from the site
just south of Canon City. The cleanup is less than half complete.
Not so much the stars at night are glowing bright - more like cows glowing green...
Tara Bozick, reporting for the Victoria
Advocate, brings us an environmental tale from deep in the heart of Texas.
Rancher John L. Gibbs worries what the release of radioactive
water into the Guadalupe River would do to his cattle that drink from
it. The 72-year-old DuPont retiree owns the land adjacent to the proposed
Exelon Nuclear plant and shares a portion of Linn Lake with the 11,500-acre
site 12 miles south of Victoria. “Any concentration at all with radioactive
waste wouldn’t be good,” Gibbs said. “Good, clean water going in there is what
you want.”
Gibbs saw that Exelon’s environmental report in its
application to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission stated that: ’Discharge of
cooling basin blowdown water and treated radwaste effluent will be to a
diffuser structure located approximately mid-channel of the Guadalupe River.’
“It’s not going to harm anybody,” Bill Harris, Exelon’s
community outreach manager, said. ”Landowners won’t be affected by minute,
periodic discharges as the releases would be monitored and in accordance with
Nuclear Regulatory Commission permit requirements. Landowners won’t need to be
notified by such releases.”
The purified effluent would have low levels of tritium,
sometimes lower than natural levels. Exelon operates its plant to keep
radioactive releases as low as reasonably achievable, well below the maximum
levels set by the Environmental Protection Agency.
Home Geiger Counters UV Torches & Marbles Bits & Bobs Nuclear Novelties Science Signs & Labels Nibbles Sources
Angela & Pamela cause concern for Alice
Here’s a brief (but interesting) report courtesy of the
pages of ABC Australia’s web pages. The exploration licence for a uranium
mine outside Alice Springs has been granted. The Northern Territory Government
has granted the licence to the joint venture of Cameco Australia and Paladin
Energy to explore for uranium at the Angela Pamela site, 25 kilometres
from Alice Springs.
The
licence includes the condition that Cameco obtain further regulatory
authorisation under mining laws. The approval of the Aboriginal Areas
Protection Authority is also required before ground work goes ahead.
An
Alice Springs environment group says it’s disappointed, but not surprised, by
the granting of the licence. Natalie Wasley from the Arid Lands Environment
Centre says that process will involve risks to the area's ecosystem.
"It
means there will be activity, a uranium project occurring 25 kilometres down
the road. At the exploration stage there is still potential for contamination
because we are dealing with a radioactive substance."
Mutters in Manatee over suspect Beryllium spill
Our
thanks to Beth Burger, reporting for the Bradenton Herald’s web
pages.Last
week Tallevast residents in Manatee County, Florida, once again stood in front
of Lockheed Martin Corp. representatives and said how a spill from a beryllium plant
has affected their lives. Tallevast residents have distrusted the company since
2003, when they learned that three years earlier dangerous chemicals had spread
from the nearby plant into their backyards.
Ray
Johnson, a senior vice president with the company, flew in from Maryland for
the two-hour meeting to assuage their concerns and listen. Johnson said he
didn't have answers to all of their questions, but said: "I'm here because
I care and we want to do the right thing,"
Many
residents are concerned about the health effects of the contamination,
dwindling value of their homes, dust and noise from construction. Even though Johnson said no health issues or
depreciation in property values could be linked to the contamination, the
company has offered a medical exam program, as well as a property value
program.
Radioactive sludge heads for landfill sites in US
Thanks
to James McGinnis reporting for the Bucks County Courier Times
and found on the Phillyburbs web pages for the following. Federal and state regulators have agreed to
let Waste Management accept low-activity radioactive
waste (which originated at the Limerick Nuclear Power Plant,
Pennsylvania) at its landfills in Tullytown and Falls.
The
landfill operator said it would transport 750 tons of sludge laced with
radioactive Cesium-137 and Cobalt-60 in special “super sack, polyethylene
bags.” That's enough to fill about 55 transport trucks.
Nuclear
Regulatory Commission senior health physicist Betsy Ulrich said the “extremely
small quantities” of radiation in the sludge pose an “extremely small risk” to
the public. “It is highly unlikely that this would affect anyone.”
Environmental
groups were nonetheless disturbed by the plan to import the radioactive
materials to a municipal landfill along the Delaware River. “Agreeing to store
nuclear waste is a slippery slope,” said James Browning, state director of the
Public Intoerest Research Group.
Scottish beach contaminated by nuclear waste
Chris Haslam, writing for The Times online web pages this
week, brings us a cautionary tale should you be considering a holiday by the
sea in Scotland. A beach contaminated
by nuclear waste is a “radioactive minefield” that
should be closed immediately, say worried locals.
Sandside
beach, an attractive bay two miles west of the decommissioned fast-breeder
reactor at Dounreay, is a popular stopping off site for tourists on the
Highland coastal route – but campaigners say that thousands of tiny but
potentially lethal radioactive fuel particles have contaminated the sand.
The
Dounreay Particles Advisory Group (DPAG) has estimated that 5,000 particles
have been accidentally discharged from the reactor’s crumbling storage shafts,
with many being washed ashore at Sandside and the popular surf spots at Dunnet
Bay and Murkle, east of Thurso.
The
UK Atomic Energy Authority (UKAEA) says that just 27 particles were found on
Sandside beach in 2007, eight of which were large enough to pose a significant
health risk. The Scottish Environment Protection Agency (Sepa) is required to
scan the beach for particles every month and say the risk is minimal.
Sydney properties built on site of uranium smelter
Thinking
of buying property in Australia? Well, best read this report from the pages of The
Age news site, then. New
South Wales Health has been accused of failing to effectively clean up
at least four Sydney properties at the site of a former uranium smelter that
operated from 1908-1915. Some years after it closed the land was acquired by
the state health department and subdivided.
NSW
Health still owns the now vacant lots at numbers 7 and 9 Nelson Parade in
Hunters Hill, but neither it nor the DECC could tell a recent inquiry where
contaminated materials from the sites were sent after being removed in 1987.
"The
records talk about it being removed and placed elsewhere but we don't know
precisely where it went to," DECC regulation director Craig Lamberton
said. When challenged about the disposal of the waste, he said: "Well, it
was (more than) 17 years ago."
Navajo reservation due for major clean-up
This
emotive story comes courtesy of Ginger Richardson, reporting for The
Arizona Republic and found on the azcentral web pages. The U.S.
government will spend tens of millions of dollars to assess and clean up
uranium contamination across the vast Navajo
Reservation, but the effort is unlikely to erase decades of frustration
over what has been characterized as a slow and sporadic federal response.
The
exploration scarred the three-state Navajo Reservation's landscape and resulted
in what tribal officials call a public-health tragedy on the reservation. The
premature deaths of Navajo miners, cancer clusters and passed-on genetic
defects are all thought to be the result of prolonged uranium exposure.
Today,
the Navajos say the new federal response effort, which includes testing of
water sources and the review of hundreds of homes and buildings for radioactive
materials, is a "good step forward." But they also have grave concerns
about the proposal, which is short on specifics in several key areas.
"It's
a significant step, but there's still a long road ahead of us," said Steve
Etsitty, executive director of the Navajo Nation Environmental Protection
Agency.
Alberta residents risk radioactive exposure
This
environmental story comes via Jeremy Loome, reporting for the Edmonton
Sun. Albertans could face a significantly higher risk of radioactive
exposure due to storage transportation, say opponents of a proposal to
build a nuclear power station in Canada.
Canada
is still 20 to 30 years away from completing a national storage facility which
(according to the Nuclear Waste Management Organization) would see spent fuel
rods from across the country being shipped to one central underground storage
location.
According
to environmental activists, a study out of the University of Calgary shows
there is nowhere geologically appropriate at the proposed location that would
suit an underground, temporary, on-site storage chamber.
With
the Peace Country facility expected to take 12-15 years to be approved - if at
all - that would mean transporting it to a storage facility elsewhere in the
province. The risk from transportation will increase, says environmentalist and
municipal councillor Trudy Keillor, when the federal facility is built some 15
years later. "Any time you're putting a lot more of this material on the
roads, you are increasing the risk of public exposure," she said.
Texas waste buried near Mexican border
Here’s
something from deep in the heart of Texas, courtesy of Enrique Rangel
writing for the Lubbock Online web pages. Starting next year, residents of Andrews County and south-eastern
New Mexico will live with nuclear
waste buried in their large but sparsely populated area.
The Texas Commission on Environmental
Quality agreed to let Dallas-based Waste Control Specialists dispose of
radioactive waste in a dumping site 3.5 miles from the Texas-New Mexico border
and 30 miles from the town of Andrews, the county seat.
"We're
very pleased. We're very excited," Rod Baltzer, president of Waste Control
Specialists told reporters after the commission voted 2-1 to authorise his
company to dispose of the nuclear waste.
Andrews
Mayor Bob Zap said after the hearing that he and other residents in the
community of 9,652 were supportive of the company.
"Our
town, from the very beginning, looked at this and asked questions. ... We
studied it. We worked closely with them. "We're really supportive of
everything that's being done and supportive of the way WCS has handled it and
will continue to handle it. We don't have any questions or doubts."
Home Geiger Counters UV Torches & Marbles Bits & Bobs Nuclear Novelties Science Signs & Labels Nibbles Sources
White Man speaks with forked tongue at Vermont Yankee
This
environmental tale is brought to you thanks to Susan Smallheer reporting
for the Rutland Herald news pages.
The recent spate of advertisements promoting the electric power
generated at the Vermont
Yankee nuclear plant as "clean and green" doesn't tell the
true story, said two Native Americans whose lands are severely affected by the
nuclear power industry.
Lorraine Rekmans, of the Northern Ojibwa people from Elliot Lake, Ontario, and
Ian Zabarte, from Mercury, Nev., secretary of state of the Western Shoshone
National Council, spoke in Brattleboro
recently, their last stop in a
weeklong visit to Vermont.
Rekmans' home, which is located on the north shore of Lake Huron, was
devastated by the pollution from 11 different uranium mines, which she said had
turned 10 lakes in the area into radioactive waste sites. For every pound of
uranium, she said, there is a ton of mine waste, and the waste was dumped into
lakes.
"People who get their power from nuclear plants should know that uranium
doesn't just fall out of the sky," she said. Much of the Western Shoshone's tribal lands are now operated as
the Nevada test site.
Development prospects at Ohio waste dump
Looking
for a bit of land to develop? Bob
Downing, reporting for the Ohio.com web pages, may have the answer.
A cleaned-up Ohio toxic waste dump is seeking a new owner: The Industrial Excess Landfill, a Superfund
site that has been in the headlines for three decades, will soon be for sale
under proposed consent decrees in U.S. District Court in Youngstown.
Negotiating
terms of the sale will be up to potential buyers and Industrial Excess Landfill
Inc., the Akron-based company that owns the 30-acre site.
But
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has imposed restrictions on what can
be done with the land: No houses, apartments, excavating or wells for drinking
water. Potential buyers, Lake Township, are proposing to use the site as either
green space, or a nature preserve.
Calvert Cliffs could be site of new power plant in Maryland
Gwen DuBois, writing for the Baltimore Sun’s web pages, brings us this
environmental story from Maryland.
With the recent settlement between the
state of Maryland and Constellation Energy Group, the power company is once
again championing Calvert
Cliffs as the site of a new nuclear power
plant. This is not a cause for celebration.
On July 13, Constellation submitted the first new application to build a
nuclear power plant in the U.S. since Three Mile Island. But the company
threatened to go elsewhere if Maryland lawmakers re-established state
regulatory control on new power plants.
Fear of a growing energy shortage is leading to calls for more nuclear power
plants. With wind power already more economical than nuclear power, and solar
power soon to be, one critic predicts nuclear power plants will be economically
obsolete before they are built.
No uranium mining in Colorado, please
Here’s something that probably passed you by, courtesy of
the Associated Press and Colorado’s Summit Daily web pages.
Jean Hediger can stand at the edge of her organic wheat farm
in Nunn, Colorado and look west to the Rockies, east toward this
speck-in-the-road town and straight ahead into what she sees as her worst
nightmare.
A Canadian company’s plans to establish a uranium mine
just across the two-lane county road from Hediger’s farm has triggered a bitter
tug-of-war with residents of this fast-growing region about 70 miles north of
Denver who fear the risk of contaminated water and other health problems.
“How do you farm organically next to a uranium mine?” Hediger
asks. “It’s pretty darned scary, isn’t it?”
Powertech Uranium Corp. Chief Executive Officer Richard
Clement insists the firm’s closed-system mining process, in which a solution of
oxygen and sodium bicarbonate is injected to recover the uranium, is safe.
“There’s a lot of misinformation out there about nuclear, about uranium, about
radiation, about the effects of mining,” he said.
5,304 fish killed at Oyster Creek plant (who counted those?)
With thanks to Tristan J Schweiger, writing for the APP web
pages. A total of 5,304 fish were killed as a result of the unplanned shutdown
of the Oyster
Creek nuclear power plant in Lacey, New Jersey, a company
official confirmed recently.
Operators
manually shut down Oyster Creek's reactor after one of the three pumps that
feed water into the reactor tripped, according to a report on the U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission Web site.
A
final root cause will likely take several weeks to determine. Elaine Makatura, a spokeswoman for the state
Department of Environmental Protection, said the determination of whether to
impose any fines on the operator would be made after the cause of the incident
is known.
1.4m Carolina residents to receive nuke pills
This report comes from Kathryn
Thier, at The
Charlotte Observer, found on the News & Observer website. Plans are
under way to distribute pills to 1.4 million people in North and South Carolina
to protect them in a nuclear
disaster, replacing ones distributed after the
Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.
Officials are urging the public not to throw away their
old potassium iodide pills as the Food and Drug Administration has extended
their shelf life for two years.
Despite
the shelf life extension, Carolinas officials are ordering new doses now. State
health officials have said new pills are on order with the federal government
to replace the outdated medication for residents living near nuclear reactors:
The pills are expected to arrive around October 2008.
US visitors to be checked for radiation particles
Here’s something to make you think whilst packing your
suitcases for your annual jaunt to foreign climes; a little gem found in
yesterday’s Guardian. Apparently, there is a chance that future visitors to the
USA and, possibly, Europe may find themselves being scanned for traces of
radioactive materials!
Because there
are so many radioactive materials and articles going ‘missing’ every year (as
we have mentioned in this section before) officials fear that it would be very
easy to get hold of some of it for nefarious uses!! Our friends at the IAEA
report that there have been 16 confirmed cases of illegal trafficking of
enriched uranium of the past 10 years and also that incidents involving
material with the potential to make a dirty bomb run into 100s.
People who have had radioactive iodine treatment
(been there, done that!) are advised not to travel too soon after treatment as
this, too, can set machines buzzing and bleeping and, in one instance back in
2003, led a bus in a New York tunnel to be stopped by the State Police as a
passenger on board had had similar treatment earlier in the day!!
White powder causes alert in Whitehaven
A man who sent a white powder to a nuclear agency (the NDA) in Whitehaven, Cumbria, sparking a
security alert will not face any charges, as police have now decided there was
"no criminal intent".
At
least 20 firefighters, along with police and two ambulance crews were on
standby for more than five hours after mailroom staff alerted them over the
package. Cumbria Police suspected the powder was toxic, but laboratory tests
proved it was harmless.
The
NDA said it was reviewing security procedures as a result of the alert
Home Geiger Counters UV Torches & Marbles Bits & Bobs Nuclear Novelties Science Signs & Labels Nibbles Sources
Radioactive materials released to landfills
According
to a recent report released by the Nuclear Information and Resource Service,
radioactive materials are being released from nuclear weapons facilities
to regular landfills and could get into commercial recycling streams.
Diane
D’Arrigo, NIRS’ Radioactive Waste Project Director, said "People around
regular trash landfills will be shocked to learn that radioactive contamination
from nuclear weapons production is ending up there, either directly released by
DOE or via brokers and processors.
Just as ominous, the DOE allows and encourages sale and donation of some
radioactively contaminated materials."
And,
just in case you were thinking about moving to Tennessee (well, you might) the
report found that the State of Tennessee is a leader in licensing processors
that can release radioactive materials for the nuclear waste generators.
"Tennessee is serving as a funnel to bring in nuclear weapons and power waste
from around the country to disperse into the landfills and recycling without
public knowledge," D'Arrigo said
Going batty at Capenhurst
Roosting bats have caused a
four-month delay to the UK's leading clean-up program. A colony of protected
Pipistrelle bats has colonized the structure of the former Capenhurst plant,
which is currently being demolished by British Nuclear Group (BNG). After
hibernating over the winter, the tiny flying mammals are now fully active and
there is a possibility they may begin to breed. BNG is hoping to stick to its
2009 completion date and is currently consulting with local conservationists.
They are also investing in new roosting boxes to encourage the bats to live
elsewhere
Wildlife flourishes at Chernobyl
The
exclusion zone around the Chernobyl nuclear
power station is teeming with life. It may be the most contaminated place on
earth, but in fact it is a perfect place for wildlife. As
humans were evacuated from the area, animals and birds moved in, including
Przewalski’s horses. Existing populations multiplied and species not seen for decades,
such as the lynx and eagle owl, began to return.
There have even been
tantalising footprints of a bear, an animal that has not trodden this part of
the Ukraine for centuries, and birds have been seen nesting in the steel and
concrete shield that was placed over the reactor.
EPA investigates buried waste at Camp Lejeune
Here’s something that may have
passed you by, thanks to the Chicago Sun Times: The Environmental
Protection Agency is investigating whether cancer-causing radioactive
material was buried in the 1980s near a rifle range at Camp Lejeune, North
Carolina, the Marine Corps' primary base on the Atlantic Ocean.
A recently recovered Navy document dated 1981 said
the material included 160 pounds of soil and two animal carcasses laced with
strontium-90, an isotope that causes cancer. The document said the dirt,
carcasses and other materials containing strontium-90 originated at a naval
research lab near the base and were buried in a remote area.
According to the paperwork, the waste was later
recovered, ''safely stored'' and was awaiting shipment to an approved disposal
site in South Carolina
DTE customers to contribute to new nuke build
Tina
Lam writing for the Detroit Free Press brings us this
environmental tale.
DTE
Energy submitted 17,000 pages of documents last week to
apply for the first new nuclear plant in Michigan in 20 years. If approved by
the federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the utility proceeds, the new
plant would be built next to the existing Fermi 2 nuclear plant near Newport.
The application won't be approved for at least four years, and the construction
would take at least six.
The
expected cost is about U$10 billion -- most of which consumers will pay as the
plant is built. Those costs will be on top of charges that will add 15% to
customers' bills over five years.
The
plant's cost depends on uncertainties, such as future costs of steel and copper
as well as recent problems in the financial markets. "Obviously, financing
a $10-billion plant is a challenge," a spokesman said.
There
has been a debate for several years over whether and how fast electricity
demand is rising in Michigan and whether any new power plants are needed. DTE
projects demand will grow enough to need a new plant by 2020
Hanford cleanup nears completion
This
is a follow-up on a story we ran earlier this year, regarding the massive
cleanup operation in Richmond. Annette Cary reporting for the Tri-City
Herald continues with this report. Hanford
workers digging up the final trench at a burial ground north of
Richmond are finding huge stainless steel tanks (one with radioactive powder
inside) measuring around 10x 8 ft., and approximately 100 drums of potentially
flammable zircaloy chips. They also found processing equipment and pipes.
Workers
have about 60 percent of the trench dug up, which Washington Closure expected
might have different materials. The approximately 500-foot-long trench has been
called the thoria trench (a reference to a white, powdery oxide of radioactive
thorium that's sometimes used in gas mantles for lanterns). At Hanford thorium
was used in a program to research a new type of nuclear weapon.
The
zircaloy, a metal alloy of zirconium and a small amount of beryllium, has been
in pieces large enough so far not to present a fire danger: the drums have been
well marked with a sticker that indicated it contained beryllium
Chilling figures from Yucca Mountain
For
years, Nevadans have successfully beaten back plans to build a massive nuclear
waste storage facility at Yucca
Mountain, just 90 miles from Las Vegas, writes Lydia Ball
for the Reno Gazette Journal’s web pages.
As
Americans find themselves sinking deeper into an energy crisis, the nuclear
energy industry is pushing to build more plants around the country. There is
one very big problem with this: It would also double the production of nuclear
waste and right now the only plan for dealing with that waste is to ship it all
to Nevada.
The
high-level nuclear waste that would be transported is nasty stuff. Under the
latest proposals, 15,638 casks of nuclear waste would travel to Nevada. Each
cask would carry between 2 and 15 tons of high-level waste.
On
its way to Nevada, the nuclear waste would travel through more than 703
counties in 45 states. More than 123 million people live along the proposed
truck routes alone and, as if that wasn’t scary enough, more than 10 million
people live within a half-mile of the proposed routes. Ultimately, Nevadans
will be most vulnerable to a disaster.
A return to Uranium mining on cards for Colorado? Locals concerned.
Thanks to the pages of
the Salt Lake Tribune web site for this one. Cattleman George Glasier
sees the next nuclear era amid the blood-orange mesas of the Paradox Valley,
Colorado; the same western lands that hold a darker legacy from the last rush
to pull uranium from the ground.
Glasier, the one-time
mining executive-turned-rancher, wants to build a uranium mill on cattle
grazing land near his spread. It would be the first in decades for America. The
land is not far from the toxic uranium mines, now mostly abandoned, that serve
as a reminder of an industry born of the Cold War.
As the third global
energy shock begins to drastically alter national economies, a potential shift
in U.S. energy policy has moved to the forefront of the upcoming presidential
election. Glasier also believes the time to return to nuclear power is now and
thinks Paradox Valley, about 300 miles southeast of Salt Lake City, is well
placed to reap the rewards.
The proposed uranium
mill would cost as much as U$150 million to build, money that Glasier is still
trying to raise. The company hopes to begin construction by 2010.
Home Geiger Counters UV Torches & Marbles Bits & Bobs Nuclear Novelties Science Signs & Labels Nibbles Sources
Contaminated water shuts down plant in Florida
Our thanks to Donna Wright, reporting for the Bradenton
Herald’s web pages.
A broken pipe caused the accidental
release of contaminated water in Tallevast, Florida, over the weekend, Lockheed Martin Corp. said
this week. The alarm system that should have been triggered by the leak and
shut down the system failed to go off.
Local residents want answers: For
months residents’ groups have been repeatedly asking for a detailed safety
response plan should an accident occur.
While a safety plan is under
development, Lockheed has repeatedly said that its systems are designed to
protect the community and pose no risk. All that changed Sunday when the water
treatment system failed and waste water from the most contaminated source of
the plume spilling out of a storage tank. The water treatment system pumps
contaminated groundwater from the source area of the toxic plume stemming from
an old beryllium (illustrated here and Be, 4 on the Periodic Table) plant and into storage tanks
where it’s sent through to a treatment system prior to being discharged into
the county sewage system.
For now, the treatment centre is
shut down whilst investigations continue.
Home Geiger Counters UV Torches & Marbles Bits & Bobs Nuclear Novelties Science Signs & Labels Nibbles Sources
Getting careless down in Boulder, Colorado
Found
on the World Net Daily web pages. A glass bottle of plutonium powder
that probably cracked when a federal employee tapped it up against a piece of
marble later fell apart, releasing the radioactive material into a Boulder,
Colorado lab, according to a new federal report on the June 9 spill.
The
report on the accident at the National Institute of Standards and Technology
campus also confirmed the substance that makes up a key component of a nuclear bomb trigger was obtained without managers' approval. When
the powder spilled the worker washed his hands at a sink connected to the
municipal sewer system and left the lab, thus spreading the contamination. Boulder City officials have complained to Congress about the mis-management of the spill and possible contamination.
TOP
Three strikes and you're out - trouble at Tricastin
With
thanks to Angelique Chrisafis, reporting for the Guardian for the
following. A
nuclear treatment centre next to the Tricastin nuclear plant in
Provence run by a subsidiary of Areva, is causing problems for local people.
Last month an accident at the treatment centre during a draining operation saw
liquid containing untreated uranium overflow out of a faulty tank. About 75kg
of uranium seeped into the ground and into the Gaffiere and Lauzon rivers.
Locals’ homes are plumbed into the local groundwater from the now contaminated
wells. After the incident there was a ban on using the groundwater for washing,
drinking and watering gardens: however, since the official ban was lifted
recently, locals still won’t drink water from their taps.
Here’s
a little footnote to this story found thanks to The Guardian. Last week,
100 workers at the Tricastin plant were contaminated with a low dose of
radiation last week and it was also reported that there was a further
‘incident’ at this plant on Tuesday – an alarm was accidentally triggered and
120 workers had to be evacuated. The French safety authority, ASN, played down
this latest incident and insisted that there was no leak and that the traces of
radiation found on workers were from the previous incident! Well, no worries
there, then…
Shall we go awandering in California?
Fancy Californian hike? Well, thanks to David Sneed, writing
for The Tribune/Mercury News, there’s an unusual one for you to try out.
Hikers now have access to three miles of
coastline north of Diablo
Canyon nuclear power plant. Pacific Gas and Electric
Co., which owns the plant and surrounding property, opened the entire length of
the Point Buchon Trail to the public in June.
The
trail, which is open from 8 am to 5pm Thursday to Monday, goes from the
southern boundary of Montana de Oro State Park to Crowbar Canyon, a point just
north of Diablo Canyon Power Plant. Hikers must sign in but do not need to be
accompanied by docents (that’s volunteer guides to you and me).
The
California Coastal Commission required that PG&E build the trail (which
winds through part of a security buffer zone around the plant) in exchange for
permission to install an above-ground storage facility for the plant's highly
radioactive used reactor fuel. This is the first time the public has had access
to this part of the Californian coastline in years. So, still fancy this, do
we??
Texan's favour new nuke plant
Here’s a recent report from Allison Miles, writing
for the Victoria Advocate in Texas. More than half of area residents
surveyed favour a proposed nuclear energy plant coming to Victoria County,
according to a recent Nuclear Energy for Texans poll.
The organization, a group dedicated to raising awareness
about nuclear
energy’s benefits, found 52% of the 601 respondents favoured a build in
the area. In December, Exelon Nuclear selected Victoria County as the primary
site for a proposed nuclear plant. The company is researching an area, but has
not made a decision to build.
18% of respondents who favoured the plant said it was
because of economical issues. Others cited the need for energy, environmental
issues and efficiency.
Towards the end of the survey, the public received bits of
information regarding the specifics of Victoria’s proposed plant, such as waste
storage, safety records and inspections. They were asked to gauge their
opinions, based on the information.
Tom Forbes, NET’s president, said: “ As respondents’
knowledge increased, their support also increased. ”
Safety training in Reno
Our
grateful thanks goes to Lenita Powers, reporting for the Reno
Gazette-Journal, for this gem: Members of two National Guard Civil Support
Teams and the Reno Fire Department are in Reno this week, training with the
city’s Hazardous
Materials Response Team.
The
92nd and 95th Weapons of Mass Destruction Civil Support Team, from Hayward,
California and Las Vegas, respectively, are training how to deal with chemical,
biological, radiological, and nuclear events. This will hopefully prepare them
for any emergencies enabling them to assist local emergency services in the
less-populated areas of their home states.
Here
are some facts and figures: Each Civil Support Team has seven officers and 15
enlisted members. The emergency vehicles include a command vehicle, operations
van, a communications vehicle that has satellite communication capabilities and
an Analytical Laboratory System van that can detect more than 84,000 organic
chemicals, toxic industrial chemicals, explosives, biological agents and other
hazardous materials. Impressive, or what?
Tennessee Valley recycling programme
The
following was filed by Mary Orndorff, writing for the Birmingham
News/al.com web pages recently. New government-sponsored research into
recycling spent nuclear fuel will be done in the
Tennessee Valley under an agreement announced by the U.S. Department of
Energy.
The
deal between the Tennessee Valley Authority and the energy department will
explore ways to reprocess fuel that leaves less waste with lower levels of
radioactivity. The announcement also prompted Senator Jeff Sessions, a nuclear
power advocate, to prepare legislation that would encourage the construction of
the nation's first reprocessing facility.
The
research agreement was announced by Assistant Secretary for Nuclear Energy, Dennis
Spurgeon and TVA Chief Operating Officer William McCollum. TVA operates six
nuclear reactors, including the recently restarted unit at Browns Ferry.
Take your geigers to Spain
As
our thoughts turn to what to pack for our Summer hols (bucket and spade,
bikini, Geiger counter) here’s a little gem courtesy of Expatica’s web pages in
Spain.
Two
ditches containing radioactive
material dug 42 years ago during the clean-up operation after two
US air force planes collided midair in 1966, spilling their nuclear payloads
over southern Spain have been found, according to Teresa Mendizábal of the
government-run environmental studies agency Ciemat.
"Two ditches have appeared, each 1,000 cubic metres in size, which have
radioactive material that the US army left behind at the last moment and which
appear in confidential reports of the [US] Department of Energy," said
Mendizábal.
The US army said then that it had cleaned up the sites, claiming to have
shipped 1.6 million tons of radioactive soil to the United States. Mendizábal
said that while hundreds of US soldiers camped at the sites during the clean-up
operation, they had left nuclear waste behind.
Home Geiger Counters UV Torches & Marbles Bits & Bobs Nuclear Novelties Science Signs & Labels Nibbles Sources
800 people being tested for contamination
There is a lot of traffic about the
following incident at the moment, so we thought we’d join in. Our thanks,
therefore, go to Martin Roberts, reporting for the Guardian’s web
pages, for picking this up via Reuters.
Up to 800 people are being examined for
contamination after a leak of radioactive material at a nuclear plant in northeast Spain last November, the nuclear
watchdog said on recently.
The Nuclear Safety Council (CSN) said it
had so far examined 579 out of between 700 and 800 people who had been through
the Asco I nuclear plant in Tarragona since the leak and none had been contaminated. The CSN said it was
considering sanctions against the plant's operators for not providing it with
enough information about the leak, which it considered to be more serious than
originally classified.
The CSN was not advised until April 4 of the leak, which
occurred during refuelling at the 1,000 megawatt Endesa-owned Plant and was
first made public by environmental group Greenpeace on April 5. CSN confirmed
this shortly afterwards and sent inspectors to the site. In a statement the CSN
said it had raised its rating of the leak to 2 on the International Nuclear
Event Scale (INES)
Australia to expand uranium mining?
Pip Hinman has filed the following report on the Green Left Weekly web
pages in Australia. The federal ALP government intends to proceed with plans to
extend uranium
mining. The Uranium Industry Framework (UIF),
which was set up by the previous government of John Howard and has never been
disbanded, has been given a new lease of life. Resources minister Martin
Ferguson was quoted in the April 2 Age newspaper as saying: “Some
countries see nuclear as part of their commitment to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions”.
Uranium exploration
is underway all around Australia and Ferguson wants Australian uranium to power
nuclear reactors in other countries, and predicts substantial growth in nuclear
power outside Australia. The UIF committee will shortly be churning out
publicity putting the “case” for the nuclear industry, to be paid for by the
uranium industry.
Dr Jim Green, anti-nuclear campaigner for Friends of the Earth, recently told
Green Left Weekly: ‘Labour is using
widespread concern about climate change to push nuclear energy.’
Florida's future - more power plants
The following article was found on the Tallahassee
Democrat web pages recently and filed by Bruce Ritchie.
Florida's
energy future, as envisioned by Gov. Charlie Crist and put forward
in sweeping House and Senate energy bills, means more nuclear power plants and
more power lines across state conservation lands. For environmental advocates it represents a trade-off: the
earth-friendly ends are important enough that some are willing to accept the
means to get there.
Environmental
opposition has been muted after Crist came out against proposed coal-fired
power plants in 2007 and made climate change fixes a state priority. But some
groups say Florida should do much more to conserve energy before heading into a
nuclear future.
Crist
signed executive orders last summer directing Florida to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions. Along with using solar panels to produce electricity and hybrid cars
to save gasoline, Crist says nuclear energy will play a key role in reducing
the emissions linked to climate change. After all, 'You have to have juice', he
said…
Turkey Point great place to be a croc!
This
is a follow-on to Friday’s nugget, found whilst searching for images of Turkey
Point. It's a shame not to share this with you especially as it is Easter and if you think
nuclear power is a bad thing.
Florida
Power & Light's (FPL's) Turkey Point nuclear power plant has played a
crucial role in saving the endangered American
crocodile (crocodylus acutus). The plant, thanks to its cooling
system, has become the main breeding ground for the crocodiles, which were on
the brink of extinction 30 years ago. The plant's cooling system, consisting of
over 100 km of canals, has created the ideal breeding environment for the
animals, which can grow up to 14 feet (4.25 m) long and live for 50-60 years.
The reptiles prefer the plant's cooling water canals because the constant water
level within the system eliminates the problem of nest flooding and protects
the nest from predators. Turkey Point has become home to one-quarter of the
USA's entire population of American crocodiles.
NDA markets site development
Grateful
thanks go to Anika Bourleyand, Chris Story and Cumbria’s News and
Star web pages. In an announcement made on Thursday it was revealed that
the Nuclear Decommissioning
Authority is marketing its sites in West Cumbria to developers who
could secure the sprawling atomic complex’s future.
The
creation of a new power station forms the backbone of the Britain’s Energy
Coast Masterplan – a bid to use £2bn of public and private sector cash to
transform the west Cumbrian economy by £800 million and create 16,000 jobs.
Agencies
charged with revitalising the area’s economy believe it is a major move towards
attracting firms interested in creating a new station in west Cumbria – fuelled
by waste already stored there.
NDA
officials have started a process to gauge interest from firms interested in
developing its land, including Sellafield, Calder Hall, Windscale and the low
level waste repository at Drigg.
US to become worlds' nuclear dump?
Found
on the Christian Science Monitor’s web pages and filed by Mike
Clayton. The US federal government is considering a Utah company's request
to import large amounts of low-level radioactive waste from Italy – a step
critics, such as Friends of the Earth,
say could lead the United States to become a nuclear garbage dump for the
world.
If
approved, the company would ship up to 20,000 tons of metal piping, sludge,
wood, contaminated clothing, and other mildly radioactive material from Italian
nuclear-power plants to Tennessee, process most of it, then dispose of the
remainder in Utah. It would be by far America's largest import of nuclear
waste.
Tom
Clements, Southeast nuclear campaign coordinator for Friends of the Earth in
Washington, said: "The NRC (Nuclear Regulatory Commission) has an
obligation to deal with the waste generated in this country first and not
accept foreign waste that fills up existing sites."
Home Geiger Counters UV Torches & Marbles Bits & Bobs Nuclear Novelties Science Signs & Labels Nibbles Sources
Twin Falls drill project approved
Here’s
an interesting report found via the Magic Valley web pages, part of the Times
News group based in Twin Falls, Idaho.
A
Canadian company's request to drill 21 exploratory cores on 2 acres of central
Idaho's Salmon River Mountains to search for uranium (originally submitted in
2007) has been approved by the U.S. Forest Service.
The Yankee Fork Ranger District of the Salmon-Challis National Forest last
month approved the
Big Hank Exploration Project proposed by Vancouver, British
Columbia-based Magnum Minerals USA Corp., a scaled-back version of the
3.5-square-mile, 71 holes the company had originally requested.
The exploration northeast of Stanley in central Idaho was approved as a
"categorical exclusion" under the National Environmental Policy Act,
meaning no thorough environmental study will be required.
Yankee Fork District Ranger, Ralph Rau said the drilling would not harm
federally listed species, or cause harm to riparian areas, road-free areas,
natural areas, or culturally significant sites. Friends of the West, an
environmental group based downstream on the Salmon River in Clayton, called the
proposal "totally irresponsible."
IAEA response team set up
An
IAEA-based international nuclear emergency
response network has become operational through receipt of its first pledges of
assistance from four Member States. Finland, Mexico, Sri Lanka and the United
States have stepped forward to make the initial commitments to the Response
Assistance Network (RANET), a global response arrangement designed to
coordinate international assistance in case of a radiation incident or
emergency.
Warren
Stern, Head of the Incident & Emergency Centre said: "With these
initial registrations, we have successfully launched the first phase of RANET.
When designing the system, we worked with a group of countries to make sure
that RANET was interoperable and responsive to a State´s needs in the event of
an emergency.”
The
backbone of RANET´s capabilities consists of technology and trained experts
which could be made available for on-site emergency response assistance.
Cleanup due at Richland, Washington State
Cleanup is due to begin on a dangerous burial ground just a
mile north of Richland,
Washington sate, according to a report found on the KNDO web site.
The US Department of Energy says this site poses the usual
radioactive risks, but in this case, they also think the buried materials may spontaneously
ignite once they're exposed to the air. Alicia Boyd, spokesperson for the EPA said: "It's good for
the environment to go ahead and move this stuff to someplace we can have a
better feel for where it is and that it's in a safe and secure location."
Records show workers could encounter pyrophoric chips of
uranium. That means flammable, in case you were wondering…
Government to announce new plant builds
Never let it be said that we don’t bring
you up to date news stories. This comes
from the BBC’s web pages: The British government's decision on whether
to build new nuclear
power stations will be announced on Thursday.
A
Number 10 spokesman said Business Secretary John Hutton would reveal the
decision in a Commons statement to MPs. Ministers have already indicated they
back new nuclear power on environmental and energy security grounds.
Speaking
to the Sunday Observer newspaper, Gordon Brown said: "When North Sea oil runs
down, both oil and gas, people will want to know whether we have made sure that
we've got the balance right between external dependence on energy and our
ability to generate our own energy within our own country.”
Yankee site released for public use
The NRC
has approved releasing most of the 210-acre Connecticut
Yankee (Nothing to do with Bing Crosby!) site for unrestricted
public use, but said that the company's licence for the Haddam Neck plant site
will still apply to the spent fuel dry cask storage facility.
Residual
contamination on the land is below the NRC's limit of 25 millirem per year for
maximum radiation dose, it said. Well, no worries there, then...
The
616-MW Westinghouse PWR started commercial operation in 1968, and was
decommissioned and dismantled earlier this year.
How we gonna clear this up, then?
The following gem was found via
the North Texas Star-Telegram web pages. Spokane, Washington State: Workers are
trying to determine how to clean up one of the worst radioactive waste leaks in
years at the Hanford
nuclear reservation, officials said.
No workers were contaminated during this accident,
and the spill was contained within a tiny area, posing no threat to the public,
officials said.
The leak was estimated at 50 to 100 gallons, although
officials are not yet sure how big it was, Delmar Noyes of the federal Energy
Department told reporters during a conference call. The spill area has been capped to prevent the waste
from becoming airborne. A plan to safely dispose of the spill is being
developed.
"The release to the environment of this waste material
is not acceptable," Noyes said.
Home Geiger Counters UV Torches & Marbles Bits & Bobs Nuclear Novelties Science Signs & Labels Nibbles Sources
Rocket engine site added to cleanup list
Found this on the LA Times web
pages, written by Gregory Griggs. The U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency has determined that a former nuclear and rocket engine testing facility
at Boeing's Santa Susana Field Laboratory near Simi
Valley should be added to the national
Superfund cleanup list.
In a letter sent to California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, the EPA's San
Francisco office recapped the history of chemical and radioactive contamination
at the 2,850-acre hilltop lab that first began operations as a nuclear research
facility in 1948. Later, it also became a rocket engine testing facility.
According to the EPA, soil and water poisoned with
trichloroethylene, estimated at more than 500,000 gallons, forced the closure
of on-site drinking wells in 1980. 32 years of nuclear testing at the lab
produced radioactive pollutants that have tainted water at the location and
could affect municipal drinking water supplies in the future
Waste to go by road to Diablo Canyon
Here’s
a report written by David Sneed for the Tribune newspaper. The
latest plans for transporting highly radioactive waste from Diablo Canyon,
California, nuclear power plant to a proposed underground disposal site in
Nevada (Yucca Mountain) allow for the possibility that the waste could be
shipped by truck over local roads to San Luis Obispo to be loaded onto trains.
However,
officials with the federal Department of Energy say the exact method of
transport will be made on a case-by-case basis for each nuclear power plant.
This leaves open the possibility that Diablo’s waste could be taken by barge
from the plant to Port Hueneme, where it could be loaded directly onto trains,
thereby bypassing local roads.
“If
a utility has the crane capacity and other infrastructure to load a rail cask
but does not have access to a railhead, then a barge or heavy-haul truck will
be used to move the cask to a railhead,” said Allen Benson, a spokesman for the
Yucca Mountain Project.
Understandably,
San Luis Obispo residents are voicing their concerns about this turn of events.
East Anglian sites to be redeveloped
With
thanks to the EADT news pages for this one. Two nuclear power station sites in East
Anglia have been earmarked for redevelopment, it was announced
recently.
A new generation of nuclear power stations moved a step closer after British
Energy said Sizewell in Suffolk and Bradwell in Essex were the most likely
sites for new reactors.
A final Government decision on the future of nuclear power is expected in 2008
and British Energy has commissioned geological, environmental and marine
studies to assess the impact of building new stations at its existing eight
nuclear plants. The company also published details of extra flood defences
needed to protect its power stations - all of which are on the coast - from the
impact of climate change.
50th Anniversary of worst Windscale accident
Never let it be said that we are
not paying attention here at anythingradioactive! The subject of today’s nugget
is being featured a lot this coming week with a programme on Radio 4 plus,
tonight, a documentary on BBC2 at 9pm. This report was filed by Russell Jenkins
on the Times Online pages.
On the 50th anniversary of
Britain's worst nuclear accident, physicists believe that they have a workable
plan to dismantle the damaged core of the Windscale
Pile 1 reactor with the aim of starting to clear away the damage left
behind by the accident. The hope is that they can do this safely without having
to immerse the core in water. This dirty relic of an early nuclear age has
remained entombed behind its concrete bioshield since fire raged for two days
in October 1957 and now, hopefully, they will be able to find out how the accident happened
You can't keep waste at Sellafield - probably 'illegal'
We found this article by Terry
Macalister via the WorldNews Network. The UK government has been
warned that it would be "wrong" and possibly illegal to use
Sellafield in West
Cumbria for long-term nuclear waste disposal.
David Smythe, emeritus (that’s
retired, to you and me) professor of geophysics at the University of Glasgow
and a nuclear waste expert, said ministers should have ruled out Sellafield -
assumed to be the favoured site - long ago after spending millions over previous
decades on research that proved the area was unsuitable because of its rock
formations. "There is clear evidence, after the expenditure of some £400m,
mostly directed to the Sellafield area, that West Cumbria possesses no suitable
rocks in which to site such a repository.”
Switzerland needs waste depositry
Asked
what might happen if storing nuclear waste above ground becomes a major
problem— particularly if Swiss
voters continue to reject proposals to bury nuclear waste permanently
at a deep underground site — Walter Heep, chief executive of Zwilag (a company
that safeguards waste from Switzerland’s five reactors) is blunt about the
problems that a lack of such a site will present for the future of the nuclear
industry in Switzerland.
“We
are not planning on a Plan B,” said Mr. Heep. “We need a final repository in
Switzerland.” But a huge obstacle remains: more than a half century after the
opening of the first commercial reactor, there is still no permanent disposal
site anywhere for highly radioactive waste of the kind overseen by Mr. Heep
Ontario residents want proof of contamination
Residents of Port Hope, Ontario, home to two nuclear industries, held up their own self-funded
research today as proof their lives are being threatened by uranium
contamination.
After
their pleas for federal government study and research went nowhere, the
community of about 16,000 raised the C$11,000 that was needed to send some test
samples overseas for analysis.
The
group now says the worst fears have been confirmed and the results show their
picturesque town is being plagued by an invisible killer — uranium
contamination. Faye More, chairwoman of the Port Hope Community Health Concerns
Committee, said Port Hope was home to two nuclear industries that have been
there for decades operating without a buffer zone from the people, emitting
uranium to air and to water every day.
Port Hope is also the
site of the largest cleanup of radioactive soil in North American history and
is currently home to the Cameco (TSX:CCO) uranium refinery.
Just mark the dates for testing days
With
thanks to Brian Lawson writing for the Huntsville Times
On
the second Tuesday morning of each month 100 sirens within 10 miles of the Browns
Ferry nuclear plant will go off.
Tennessee
Valley Authority wants people to be aware that there can be an occasion - with
three operating reactors at Browns Ferry - in which a problem at the Athens
plant prompts an evacuation.
In
preparation for this, TVA mailed out 42,200 calendars this year to residents
who live inside a 10 mile radius of the plant. Residents who hear the siren,
outside the normal testing period, should tune in to their radios or TV to find
out if emergency information is being broadcast, TVA officials said.
Residents
in Lauderdale, Lawrence, Limestone and Morgan counties are all included in
TVA's emergency plans. Because Madison County is considered a host county, it
would offer shelter to residents if shelter needs prove too great for the
affected counties.
Capenhurst decommissioning wins accolade
This one probably passed you by. Work to safely
decommission a redundant nuclear enrichment facility and associated
buildings at Capenhurst, near Chester, has won a top accolade.
The site has come out top of all UK decommissioning sites
for its safety record, progress against schedules and costs.
Capenhurst, which is bidding to become the first UK
decommissioning site to complete its clean-up in 2009, was judged to have
attained this accolade by the site's owner, the Nuclear Decommissioning
Authority, in its quarterly review.Phil Malem, head of Capenhurst's decommissioning site, said:
“This is a big endorsement of the effort and diligence of everyone on site”
Ontario could eliminate new plant needs
Ontario could
eliminate the need for two planned new nuclear plants by counting on
inter-provincial energy imports, stepping up renewable power generation and
encouraging energy conservation, two national environmental groups say.
The
Pembina Institute and World Wildlife Fund want to make the proposed plants an
issue in this Autumn’s election and opened a recent debate by presenting a
computer modelling study showing how Ontario could meet future energy needs
without the new plants and how it could shut down its two coal plants before
the current 2014 deadline.
Spokespeople
for both the Ontario Chamber of Commerce and the Ontario Energy Association
have called the plan impractical.
"The
province's industrial plants, potential new automotive investments, new high
tech investments, the millions of jobs these industries support - they all
need to know Ontario has clean, reliable and competitively priced baseload
power," said Shane Pospisil, head of the OEA.
Home Geiger Counters UV Torches & Marbles Bits & Bobs Nuclear Novelties Science Signs & Labels Nibbles Sources
Dounreay workers monitored for contamination
Here's a recent news item, found on the Scotsman web pages:Ten
workers were monitored for possible plutonium
contamination after a surprise find at the
Dounreay nuclear plant. A team of four was carrying out an
inspection at a manhole where plutonium was not expected and so were not
wearing respiratory gear.
Readings showed suspected
plutonium and work was stopped. Three of the four were being monitored as a
precaution, as were another seven workers who have had reason to work there
before. The UK Atomic Energy Authority
suspended all work of a similar nature at the complex until it identified the
cause of the contamination.
Safety measures in place for US power stations
Measures at the 104 US nuclear
power stations to mitigate the effects of large fires and explosions
that could result from a terrorist attack, including the impact of a large
commercial aircraft, are now mostly in place and, with minor exceptions, will
be completed by the end of 2007, the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
reported recently.
In early 2002 the NRC
ordered a sweeping series of nuclear plant security upgrades in the wake of the
11 September 2001 terrorist attacks. Nuclear plant operators have been working
since then to implement site-specific measures to increase security. Nuclear
plants are already recognised as robust, with the very design features that
protect against external hazards such as tornadoes and hurricanes, as well as
nuclear accidents, providing protection against potential acts of terrorism.
Russian Arctic waste dump could explode
Found recently on the Fox News web site from Oslo,
Norway: A nuclear waste dump in the Russian Arctic may be in danger of exploding
because of corrosion caused by salt water in enormous storage tanks, the
Norwegian environmental group Bellona warned Friday. The three
tanks are used to store spent nuclear fuel rods at Andreeva Bay, on the Kola
Peninsula of northwestern Russia, just
28 miles from the Norwegian border, the Oslo-based group said in a statement.
Alexander Nikitin,
one of Bellona’s nuclear experts was quoted as saying:" We discover now
that we are sitting on a powder keg, with a fuse that is burning, but we don't
know how long that fuse is."
Muckaty Station waste dump 'safe'
Here’s a little gem found on the Australian ABC web site:
The Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO) says the
nuclear waste dump proposed for Muckaty Station
in the Northern Territory will be completely safe. The Northern Land Council
has nominated the site, 120 kilometres north of Tennant Creek, for a low- and
intermediate-level repository.Traditional owners from the region visited ANSTO's Lucas
Heights facility in New South Wales to see the type of waste that could be delivered
to the dump.
ANSTO chief of
operations Dr Ron Cameron said that the waste includes plastic gloves and
contaminated clothing and is, therefore, completely innocuous. He was also
quoted as saying: "I think some people want to use misinformation to try and
get up a scare campaign. We want to let people know the type of waste that this
really is.”
No public risk over Thorp leak
UK safety authorities
recently completed their analysis of the internal leak of radioactive liquor at Sellafield's
Thorp
facility. Although the leak at Thorp was contained by
design and did not put workers or the public at risk, the Health and Safety
Executive (HSE) has concluded that the failure to promptly detect it was down
to the "inadequate monitoring arrangements and management oversight" Mike Weightman, the Chief Inspector of
Nuclear Installations, called for sustained excellence in nuclear operation, saying that
"High standards are expected."
Energy Alberta looks for host communities
Energy
Alberta is searching for
communities to host the province's largest power station, which would provide
emission-free power for oil sands projects. The company plans to build a
C$6.2 billion twin Candu reactor plant in northern Alberta, and is looking
at various communities as potential hosts.
Canada has huge
reserves of oil sands -extracting it requires huge amounts of heat and steam.
The associated greenhouse gas emissions are a further barrier to economic
oil extraction. According to Alberta Energy President Wayne Henuset, "I
believe nuclear is the best way to produce the power the province needs."
German waste disposal site gets go-ahead
Germany's
first disposal site for low- and intermediate-level radioactive waste is set to
go ahead after the Federal Administrative Court ended years of legal argument
and delay. The plan to convert
the Konrad site,a former iron ore mine in Lower Saxony,
and to use it as a final repository, was first approved by the state
environment ministry in 2002 after almost 20 years of proceedings. The Konrad
site will hold up to 303,000 cubic metres of waste - some 95% of the waste
volume with 1% of the radioactivity from Germany's nuclear industry.
Faulty reactor start-up allowed
Internal documents seen by the Independent
on Sunday, Britain's
nuclear watchdog last month allowed a faulty nuclear reactor to start
up even though it had not been fitted with an important safety system
The documents also show that the
Nuclear Installation Inspectorate (NII) judged that the reactor, at Oldbury
nuclear power station in Gloucestershire, was not safe enough to operate for
the next 18 months, but allowed it to go on-stream until November anyway.
The revelations - described as
"deeply alarming" by top nuclear expert John Large - are bound to
fuel concern at a time when ministers are encouraging the building of a new
generation of reactors.
Exelon receives Early Site Permit
Exelon
have received the first Early Site Permit (ESP) to be issued in the new US
nuclear licensing scheme. It certifies the Clinton
site in Illinois as suitable for a nuclear power plant, to be built sometime in
the next 20 years. The US Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC) has voted to approve the ESP and should formally
issue the permit shortly. An ESP confirms that in principle the site is
suitable for a new nuclear plant: should Exelon go ahead with a new nuclear
plant at Clinton, its next steps would be to select a reactor design and submit
a combined Construction and Operating Licence (COL) application to the NRC
(Nuclear Regulatory Commission)
Two year delay at Cigar Lake due to rock fall
Following
a dramatic rock fall and water inflow at the Cigar
Lake uranium mine in October 2006,
developers Cameco have announced a two-year delay to the project. Led by
Cameco, a consortium of Areva Resources Canada, Idemitsu Canada Resources and
Tepco Resources have been developing the deposit in the north of Canada's
province of Saskatchewan. In October 2006 a
rock fall in the underground production area of the mine led to flooding which
was not stopped by the closure of bulkhead doors. Cameco managers decided to
evacuate the mine and allow the water to overtake it.
Uranium mining could return to Spain
Uranium
mining could return to Spain.
Mawson Resources of Canada has submitted two applications to explore for
uranium in the La Haba district of Extremadura in southwestern Spain. Spain currently has no front-end nuclear fuel cycle facilities: operation of
the Saelices el Chico (Salamanca) uranium mine ended in 2000, and a previous
operation at La Haba was shut down in 1990. The La Haba project
includes the historic open pit uranium mine and existing resources, which are
overlain by a 3865 ha State Reserve to which Mawson presently has no
entitlement.
EPA fines Energy Dept $1.1m over 'violations'
Richland,
Washington: The
Environmental Protection Agency fined the federal Energy Department
$1.1 million over violations of an agreement to clean up the Hanford nuclear
reservation, America's most polluted nuclear site. The federal government
created Hanford in the 1940s as part of the top-secret Manhattan Project to
build the atomic bomb.
This
fine involved operations at a landfill that is the primary repository for
contaminated soils, debris and other hazardous and radioactive waste from
cleanup operations across the site.
UKEA lodges planning application for new plant
The
UK Atomic Energy Authority (UKAEA)
has lodged a planning application to construct an integrated plant to treat and
store intermediate-level radioactive waste at Dounreay. The waste to be handled by the facility includes
the raffinates from the recycling of used nuclear fuel from the site's two fast
reactors which account for 50% of radioactive inventory and 80% of the
radioactive hazard at Dounreay and are currently stored in underground tanks
that are set to be cleaned out for decommissioning.
Home Geiger Counters UV Torches & Marbles Bits & Bobs Nuclear Novelties Science Signs & Labels Nibbles Sources
Finland embarks on 'final' waste solution
Finland is one of
a handful of countries to embark on the journey towards a "final"
waste solution. Investigators will be the first to go down the Onkalo tunnel,
aiming to demonstrate that the rock is structurally sound enough to proceed
with the disposal of spent fuel rods containing plutonium and other unpleasant
materials.
If they were to turn
up a positive result, and if government agencies grant the necessary licences,
the first canisters of spent fuel would begin rolling down the tunnel about 15
years from now
WNA claims world needs 20x current nuclear plants
Environmentalists
have rejected a claim by the World Nuclear Association that the world
needs 20 times as many nuclear power plants to avoid the disastrous effects
of global warming.
Using more nuclear
power was not only environmentally damaging but would also risk increasing
nuclear proliferation, the head of Greenpeace Australia said. .
20 Ontario plants store radioactive material in mine
There
are 20 plants in Ontario, each
producing 100 tons of radioactive material presently stored in tanks filled
with water. They are now planning on storing it in a mine near the Great Lakes.
We hope it’s a pretty deep mine
.
Scotland's watchdog plays down contamination risk
Scotland’s
green watchdog played down the risks of radioactive contamination at a popular coastal resort in Fife following an 11th-hour intervention by government spin - doctors. Internal emails revealed the Scottish Environment Protection Agency delayed and then altered a news release after it had been described as
"not entirely helpful"…
Carlsbad plant to receive high-level waste
More stuff to keep you awake at night: The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant near Carlsbad in SE New Mexico is
going to be receiving waste that is much more radioactive than the waste it has
been storing. New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson is scheduled to
sign what ‘s being called a major permit modification for the plant that will
allow it to receive the hotter waste.
Swiss nuclear bunker - doors don't shut
LUCERNE,
Switzerland: For 30 years, tourists speeding south through the Sonnenberg
tunnel to Italy have had no idea they are driving through one of the world's
biggest nuclear bunkers. It takes two weeks to prepare in an emergency – oh,
and by the way, the doors don’t shut!!
Homeland Security to up port defences with radiation scanners
San
Francisco -- The Department of Homeland Security announced plans last month to
bolster U.S. port defences with radiation
scanners. The program, primarily aimed at detecting nukes smuggled by
terrorists in shipping containers, will cost an estimated $1.15 billion, but
won't be completed until 2011
Areva after US nuclear recycling project
PARIS
(Reuters) -
France's
Areva (CEPFi.PA) is among several companies interested in vying for a
nuclear recycling project in the United States, the world's largest maker of
nuclear reactors said. Areva, however, declined to confirm that the investment
would amount to between $10 and $15 billion.
Russian tanker looking for dump site for spent fuel
Heard on the news today (29th Sept) about the Russian tanker cruising the Arctic Circle carrying spent nuclear fuel and how its transportation is an environmental accident waiting to happen in this very busy sea lane. If you know any more, drop us a line and we may visit this topic again.
Radioactive material found in drinking water
WHITE PLAINS, N.Y. - High levels of a
radioactive material — nearly three times the amount permitted in drinking
water — were found in groundwater near the Hudson
River beneath a nuclear plant
although the owner, Entergy Nuclear Northeast, said it didn’t intersect
drinking supplies
70 years since protection recommendations began
It’s been 70 years since international organizations began
establishing recommendations for the protection of people and the environment
from any harmful effects of radiation.
Cooling ponds safe haven for baby crocs
As most of the world’s nuclear power
plants are clean, the areas around cooling ponds are often developed as
environmentally rich wetlands, providing a safe environment for all kinds of
wildlife. In Florida, for example, 160 miles of dredged cooling canals now
provide a safe haven for newly-hatched crocodiles
Nuclear energy produces no greenhouse gas
Found in Cosmos magazine: Nuclear energy produces no greenhouse
gases, but it has many drawbacks. Now a radical new technology based on thorium
promises what uranium never delivered: abundant, safe and clean energy - and a
way to burn up old radioactive waste.
Here, kitty, kitty!
Radioactive Kitty Litter found
amongst 20 tons of rubbish at a US nuclear power station sparked a safety
alert. This was traced to a pet cat that had been treated with the radioactive
substance iodine-131 - yes, really!!
Jelly fish close Japan plant
A nuclear plant in central Japan was forced to slash its
power generation after a swarm of jellyfish blocked off its pipes.
We don't want refugee traffic around here
NEW YORK - A
terrorist attack on a nuclear power plant and the panic that would ensue is a
nightmare that has kept many Americans up at night since Sept. 11.
Particularly
concerned are those who live near the plants: local householder Elise Cooper
said ‘It’s beyond enormous: weekday traffic in the area is bad enough even
without a catastrophe jamming the streets with fleeing residents.’
Unusual event declared at Nine Mile Point
SCRIBA,
N.Y. Officials at Nine Mile Point, declared an "Unusual Event"
effectively shutting down the nuclear power plant. The "Unusual
Event" is the least serious of four emergency classifications defined by
the federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission. In order of increasing seriousness,
the classifications are: Unusual Event, Alert, Site Area Emergency and General
Emergency. There
was no release of radiation or injuries associated with the event; all
appropriate local, state, and federal agencies were notified.
Nuclear power gets second look in California
Thanks goes to Janis Mara (Costa
Contra Times) for this piece found on the Inside Bay Area / Oakland
Tribune web pages. As concerns about greenhouse gases and global warming mount, nuclear energy is getting a second look
in California.
Stewart
Brand, who created the Whole Earth Catalogue, which covered subjects including
alternative energy, recently said: "Global warming is affecting the
fisheries in northern California and creating drought to the south. Like a
number of other environmentalists, I have had to change my tune,"
Indeed,
nuclear is an energy alternative that produces fewer greenhouse gases than
coal, generates cheap round-the-clock electricity and creates roughly 1 million
times the energy released by the burning of oil.
Despite
numerous obstacles, a small group of business representatives are fighting to
launch a renaissance of nuclear energy in California and recent comments by
Governor Schwarzenegger suggest that he is in agreement with these plans.
Hanford Nuclear awaits clean-up
This little environmental gem comes via Tacoma’s
News Tribune web pages. Residents of Washington State once counted on the Hanford Nuclear
Reservation being cleaned up in their lifetimes. Due
to serious lack of funding it’s looking like not even their great-grandchildren
will live to see the day.
The
cleanup project long ago veered from the 30-year timeline laid out in 1989 when
the federal government committed itself to remedying the toxic legacy of Cold
War nuclear production. President Bush
has proposed the lowest level of nuclear cleanup funding since 1997. His budget
would put the biggest cleanup challenge on pace for completion somewhere around
2150.
Some
of the double-wall tanks due for cleaning are past their design life; none of
them is built to last another 150 years. They will eventually fail, and when
they do, the leaking waste will join the plume of contaminated groundwater
headed toward the Columbia River. Nice one, George…
Hanford in need of clean-up
Our thanks go to Annette Cary
writing for the Tri-City Herald web site for this one. Plans are being
developed to start cleaning up Hanford's 13-square-mile
‘BC controlled area,’ which is spotted with radioactive caesium 137 and
strontium 90 even though none of the work to produce plutonium for the nation's
nuclear weapons program was done there.
Just south of the BC cribs and trenches
50 million gallons of liquid waste contaminated with radioactive salts were
discharged during the Cold War. Animals attracted to the salts spread the waste
across miles of the Hanford desert.
Matt
McCormick, Department of Energy assistant manager for central Hanford cleanup,
said "This area has a large spread of contamination on the surface with
the ability to move around with our winds,"
An
engineering analysis concluded that the surface soil in contaminated spots
should be dug up and hauled to a lined landfill for low-level radioactive waste
a few miles to the west. Work to dig up an estimated 237,000 cubic yards of
dirt could begin later this year.
Ocean County residents risk thyroid cancer
Our
thanks to Alan Guenther, writing for the Asbury Park Press. More
than 150,000 people in
Ocean County are unnecessarily at risk of getting thyroid cancer if
there is a radiation release from the oldest US nuclear plant, Oyster Creek, in
Lacey, New Jersey.
Local
residents are at risk because most have failed to pick up free KI pills that
could be taken in the event of an accident at the plant. The KI (potassium
iodide) pills originally distributed in 2002 have expired.
New
pills were made available in April; but of the 162,951 people living within 10
miles of the power plant, only 4,150 pills were picked up at six free clinics
offered by Ocean County last year and approximately 250,000 KI pills are
stockpiled, unclaimed by the public.
If
you thought that was bad, more than 35,000 KI pills are stockpiled at local
schools in case there's a nuclear accident, but, as yet, have not been sent
home with the children.
Rockwell man makes mini nuclear reactor
Whilst
the Americans are worrying about a potential terrorist threat from Europe (and
that includes us, people) here’s a little gem that makes this job worthwhile,
courtesy of Jason Trahan and the Dallas News web pages. A
22-year-old Rockwall man's Internet boasts that he had made a mini-nuclear
reactor in his garage resulted in a visit from the FBI and Texas Health
Services. They removed science
equipment at the request of the man’s parents.
The
man, who was not identified by authorities and who could not be reached, was
experimenting with Americium-241, a man-made radioactive element common in
smoke detectors, and natural radioactive ore that he had bought legally on
eBay.
Officials
discovered the homemade atomic lab in December, when they found the man's
boasts on an amateur science blog. On it, he said that he had produced high
amounts of radiation in his house while making Plutonium-239, a component in
nuclear weapons. Tests on the home did
not show abnormal levels of radiation, and his neighbours were in no danger.
Robots to clean up offshore sites in UK
With
apologies for the picture on the index page – well, we couldn’t resist – and staying in the UK, here
is a nice little story from the pages of World Nuclear News. A team of underwater
robots could scour the offshore next to the Dounreay nuclear site to
remove radioactive particles from the seabed and reduce the number being washed
onto the beach if proposals by the UK Atomic Energy Authority are approved.
Radioactive
particles escaped into the environment, mainly during the period of reprocessing
during the early years of the Dounreay site. The systems in place to minimise
particulate release, including a diffuser, were not sufficiently effective
to prevent the release of particles.
It
is proposed that over the next seven years remotely operated vehicles will
scour around 600,000 square metres of seabed.
Drum Thunker leads way in safer storing of nuclear waste
Back
to ’97, this time to Starkville,
Miss.--A "drum-thunker" and a high-temperature electric torch
were helping a Mississippi State laboratory develop ways for America and the
world to reduce and safely store nuclear wastes..
Hurricane more powerful than nuclear weapons
Impress your friends at dinner parties with this
little gem: In 10 minutes, a hurricane
releases more energy than all the world's nuclear weapons combined.
Home Geiger Counters UV Torches & Marbles Bits & Bobs Nuclear Novelties Science Signs & Labels Nibbles Sources
Lab coats on for nuke waste disposal
Lab
coats on for a trip to the US: Back in ’97, a Dr. Delbert Day from the University
of Missouri-Rolla, received a patent to research if glass may be the answer
to safely dispose of nuclear waste by encapsulating plutonium in a special type
of glass.
Floating nuclear power plant proposed for Russia
With thanks to World Nuclear News: A site selection
process has been agreed for another floating nuclear power plant in Russia. At a recent meeting between the Republic of Sakha and Russia's Federal
Atomic Energy Agency (Rosatom) the Yakutia region was proposed.
If you know your geography, you will know that Sakha is the largest republic in
the Russian Federation. It spans three time zones in the Yakutia region (the
proposed new site) but has less than one million inhabitants.
Rosatom said the agreement, signed by Sergei Kiriyenko and Sakha President
Vyacheslav Shtyrov, was aimed towards developing an investment project for the
construction of a floating nuclear power plant in order to support later
infrastructure projects in the Arctic north of Sakha
Gorbachev - 'Look before you leap' when building power stations
Mikhail
Gorbachev, the former Soviet leader, has warned countries to "look
before you leap" before building more nuclear power stations. The Soviet
Union had been forced to spend tens of billions of roubles to combat the
radiation danger, he said, but the pollution of the soil, earth and air was
still causing long-term damage.
Plutonium is dangerous - do not inhale
Here’s a gem from the department of the
blindingly obvious: Plutonium is radiologically
hazardous, particularly if inhaled, so must be
handled with appropriate precautions.
British Government must act over waste
The government must act now to dispose of Britain's nuclear waste, the Royal Society has said,
because the process itself will take decades. Their
solution, based on current scientific knowledge: bury the stuff in deep
concrete bunkers!
|