![]()
|
If you have any interesting or unusual nuclear facts, send them in and we will publish them. The sender of the best nugget each week will receive one of our keyrings Send your entries HERE |
|||||||||||||
|
Engineers at the U.S. Department of Energy's Argonne National Laboratory, using an emerging sensing technology, have developed a suite of sensors for national security applications that can quickly and effectively detect chemical, biological, nuclear and explosive materials. This technology can also be used to detect if a country is using its nuclear reactors to produce material for nuclear weapons.
With
apologies for the picture on the index page – well, we couldn’t resist – and staying in the UK, here
is a nice little story from the pages of World Nuclear News. A team of underwater
robots could scour the offshore next to the Dounreay nuclear site to
remove radioactive particles from the seabed and reduce the number being washed
onto the beach if proposals by the UK Atomic Energy Authority are approved. Radioactive
particles escaped into the environment, mainly during the period of reprocessing
during the early years of the Dounreay site. The systems in place to minimise
particulate release, including a diffuser, were not sufficiently effective
to prevent the release of particles. It
is proposed that over the next seven years remotely operated vehicles will
scour around 600,000 square metres of seabed.
The
country's Atomic Energy Agency says that new supplies will be ready within days
to meet a worldwide shortage. The
Chalk River nuclear plant in the province of Ontario, in Eastern Canada,
produces isotopes used all over the world for medical imaging and diagnostic
scans for fractures, cancer and heart conditions. The 50-year old reactor was originally shut down for a week of routine maintenance but the country's nuclear regulator refused to allow it to resume production until a number of safety issues were resolved.
Back in 2003, the Japanese corporation Toshiba wanted to thrust the Alaskan community of Galena into the international limelight by donating a new, unconventional electricity-generating plant that would light and heat the Yukon River village, pollution-free, for 30 years. The catch? It was a nuclear reactor! The question? Was it ever built?
The White Sands public-affairs staff had been telling it the same way until Los Alamos National Lab Scientists Robert Hermes and William Strickfaden published the results of their recent investigation.
Strickfaden said he ran the appropriate numbers through the appropriate formulas and could not get the atomic fireball to form glass in the thickness found on site. He said the fireball did not hover over the site long enough to account for glass that thick. After further research, they suggested that the desert sand was scooped up into the fireball instead of being baked on the ground underneath it. Thorium Oxide could be the answer to many concerns about nuclear power. Reactors that use thorium, rather than uranium, produce radioactive waste that needs to be stored for only 500 years. They can also incinerate the much longer-lived radioactive products from conventional nuclear plants, making a Chernobyl-type meltdown virtually impossible: Okay…
Researchers at MIT have developed technology they say will boost the power output of nuclear power plants by 50 per cent, and make them safer to run. Well, that’s okay then…
Making an atomic bomb isn’t for dummies - or for sissies. "It's not done in your basement or bathtub," said Robert Norris, a nuclear weapons expert at the Natural Resources Defense Council, an environmental group in Washington. Okay…
Back to ’97, this time to Starkville, Miss.--A "drum-thunker" and a high-temperature electric torch were helping a Mississippi State laboratory develop ways for America and the world to reduce and safely store nuclear wastes..
|
|
Copyright © 2006 - 2008 anythingradioactive.com |
|
All information on this web site is provided as is without warranty of any kind. Neither Rick Maybury Ltd nor its employees nor contributors are responsible for any loss, injury, or damage, direct or consequential, resulting from your choosing to use any of the information or products contained herein. |